Conservatives Begin Calling For Craig To Resign Over ‘Lewd Conduct’ And Guilty Plea
Conservatives Begin Calling For Craig To Resign Over ‘Lewd Conduct’ And Guilty Plea
Yesterday, Roll Call revealed that Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID) was arrested in June for “lewd conduct” in a public restroom at a Minnesota airport. On Aug. 8, he pleaded guilty to “misdemeanor disorderly conduct.”
While Craig says the police misconstrued his actions and that he “should not have pled guilty,” pressure for him to resign is already beginning to mount in conservative circles.
On NBC’s Today Show this morning, former White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer called Craig’s police report “creepy,” adding that “I don’t think Larry Craig can survive this.” Watch it:
Though Craig resigned yesterday from his position as Senate co-chairman of Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign, his spokesman, Sidney Smith, told the Associated Press yesterday that “it’s too early to talk” about his Senate future.
Smith’s comments have gone unheeded by prominent conservative bloggers, however, who have started shouting from their digital rooftops that Craig should resign immediately:
“Craig’s behavior is so reckless and repulsive that an immediate exit is required…He has to go.” – Hugh Hewitt
“I’m inclined to agree with Hugh Hewitt. The Senator did, after all, choose to plead guilty.” – Mark Steyn of National Review Online
“Hugh Hewitt calls for his resignation. At the least, he should confirm that he will not run again.” – Captain’s Quarters
“He’s a lying crapweasel. Should he resign? Well, yeah. If he cared about the dignity of his office, he would. But he obviously doesn’t, does he?” – Michelle Malkin
“He’s pled guilty. And we’re just finding out about it today. I can only say he must resign.” – Erick Erickson of Redstate
The GOP Senate leadership has refused to comment on Craig’s future thus far, only saying that they “just found out about this incident.”
“If they think this is going to be something that’s the same as (Rep.) Mark Foley — the sort of ‘drip, drip, drip, there’s more information that’s going to come out,’ Idaho-based political scientist Jasper LiCalzi told the AP. “They may try to push him out.”
UPDATE: First Read has more conservative blogs distancing themselves from Craig.
UPDATE II: Glenn Greenwald has much more conservative reaction.
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
“drip drip drip”,
Not a good metaphor.
August 28th, 2007 at 12:53 pmHere you go, why (aka Joker).
August 28th, 2007 at 12:54 pmWhy do the Republican’s hate homosexuals so much?
(for those confused, Joker tried to derail the thread with his baseless liberal attacks on Gonzales’ grammatical error. This is now on topic, and I await Joker’s response)
“He’s a lying crapweasel. Should he resign? Well, yeah. If he cared about the dignity of his office, he would. But he obviously doesn’t, does he?†– Michelle Malkin
She was obviously referring to Cheney, wasn’t she?
August 28th, 2007 at 12:54 pmNo?
Oh, then Bush for sure.
When Larry tapped, I was takin’ a crap.
August 28th, 2007 at 12:54 pmRomney should have shown some good old Xian charity and raised him up to his chief of staff…
August 28th, 2007 at 12:55 pm“crapweasel”? Yeah, those leftwing bloggers sure are childish and crude.
Were any of them asked why it’s okay for David Vitter to repeatedly break the law and lie about it?
August 28th, 2007 at 12:56 pmIf Vitter didn’t resign, what make’s you think Craig is gonna do it? IOKIYR!
August 28th, 2007 at 12:59 pmAccording to the picture, James Carvell has been embalmed.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:00 pmDRxJ,
Hypocrite.
TP has a thread attacking this giuy and now that the Right is calling for him to resign now you clowns defend him.
As for the Gay aspect I don’t care!
Gays and Muslims are treated better than Hispanics and Italians in this society.
The problems aren’t mine!
Their
August 28th, 2007 at 1:00 pmIf this happened last June, who are they trying to distract from this time? Fredo is gone, but is there something else in the works?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:00 pmThe same could be said for Senator Diaper Dave Vitter. These people of their moral majority are nothing but hypocrites.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:01 pmOK, who put the camera up in the Senate restroom?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:01 pm“According to the picture, James Carvell has been embalmed.
Comment by RUCerious — August 28, 2007 @ 1:00 pm”
Yeah, he looks better than he has in years…..but that ain’t sayin’ much…
August 28th, 2007 at 1:02 pmFavorite part of the piece was when Ari Fleischer said there were 2 democrats in the “pokey”.
Even if that’s True: He can only *think* of 2?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:02 pmVitter would be replaced by a Dem, so they keep their mouths shut, but since Craig would be replaced by a Republican (think that’s how they do it), they shout from the rooftops. WOULD SOMEONE (Think Progress?) MAYBE CHECK THIS AND POINT IT OUT?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:03 pmComment by RUCerious — August 28, 2007
lmao! nicely done.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:04 pmRepublicans are so quick to forget that their party was founded by one of the greatest American presidents, Lincoln, who just happened to be a homosexual man. Embrace it trolls, it’s your past present and glorious future.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:04 pmCraig’s name was one of the ones mentioned in the child sex ring that involved the Reagan/Bush White House 25 years ago. Of course, he denied his involvement and the entire investigation mysteriously disappeared, although it made headlines at the time even in conservative newspapers like the Washington Times:
http://tomflocco.com/Docs/Wt/WashTimes1989-1T.jpg
August 28th, 2007 at 1:04 pmfrom ed’s show (credit where credit is due):
where is the COP on this story? …why did it take so long to get this story out there? … did craig report this to the ethics committee?…
August 28th, 2007 at 1:05 pmwho covered up this story for so long?
…
Is Craig’s “stance” on the john as wide as his stance on immigration?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:05 pm“Republicans are so quick to forget that their party was founded by one of the greatest American presidents, Lincoln, who just happened to be a homosexual man. Embrace it trolls, it’s your past present and glorious future.
Comment by miatch — August 28, 2007 @ 1:04 pm”
And if it is, what’s it to you? Are you homophobic or something?
You folks sure spend a lot of time worrying about other people’s personal behavior…..at least you do when it suits your purposes…
August 28th, 2007 at 1:07 pmAccording to the picture, James Carvell has been embalmed.
Comment by RUCerious — August 28, 2007 @ 1:00 pm
If you were married to his wife, you’d wish you were dead too.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:08 pmYou folks sure spend a lot of time worrying about other people’s personal behavior…..at least you do when it suits your purposes…
Comment by O. Bigfoot — August 28, 2007 @ 1:07 pm
So, think the Neuticles will work for ya??
August 28th, 2007 at 1:08 pmAnd if it is, what’s it to you? Are you homophobic or something?
- Comment by O. Bigfoot
Why does it make me homophobic to point out that the Republican party is the party of self-hating homosexuals?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:09 pm“He’s a lying crapweasel. Should he resign? Well, yeah. If he cared about the dignity of his office, he would. But he obviously doesn’t, does he?†– Michelle Malkin
This goes for pretty much the whole Bushco Crime Family doesn’t it? Also, something about Ari Fleischer calling it “creepy” is creepy…Years of wingnuttia observation has me wondering why they are so quick to pounce on Craig’s corpse…he must really have ticked someone off in La Famiglia…unlike Foley who looks like he’ll be saved.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:10 pmCONSERVATIVES GONE WILD!!!
Can’t wait for the video!

August 28th, 2007 at 1:10 pmSen Craig should not resign, but he should seek redemption through Christ Jesus. As long as William Jefferson is considered a Congressman, Sen. Craig should stay. We still cannot determine whether or not he was signaling the agent to complete a sexual act. Maybe he hit his foot accidentally.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:11 pmI suppose that he pleaded guilty to avoid a trial and further “exposure.” Uh Hum, cough cough. But give me a break disorderly conduct or interference with privacy. seems kind of weak when all he did was waive his hand under the stall and maybe play a little footsy. Creepy? yes. Obvious Intention to do “something”? probably. But it seems like a thought crime.
I agree that the GOP is full sleazy hypocritical closet perverts. They deserve what they get – political karma. As far as the crime goes I think the use of this law is to persecute it seems a little pretextual to me. Shouldn’t they be spending resources on real crimes.
What an idiot though for pleading. I mean couldn’t he say “hey man I was just looking for a little help with the TP shortage in my stall” or maybe to signal “a courtesy flush please, dude, you reak.”
Couldn’t the cop have like done something more substantial like ask how much or like stick his unit in his palm or something.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:12 pmYou giuys are a bunch of self righteous losers.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:12 pmEveryday complaining about something!
Get a life!
Comment by katy — August 28, 2007
Good questions, all.
Let me go on the record here, despite the schedenfreude. I think these bathroom sting operations are ridiculous and harassing. However, I am not about to forgive Craig or stop mocking him for his record against the gay-lesbian community. Hypocrisy. Fact is, he plead guilty to a crime and failed to disclose it at a minimum to his ethics committee. He got on his high horse about naughty bad boy Clinton readily enough. Karma is a byatch.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:12 pmHere’s a copy of the actual police report, along with follow-up reports when Craig later went to the police station to ask for his charging documents to be sent to his lawyer. Apparently, he had a lawyer, as he mentioned his lawyer to two different police officers.
http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2007/images/08/28/craig.incident.report.pdf
The part in the police report about the way Craig stood just right outside the bathroom stall of the undercover cop for several minutes and stared at him through a crack is particularly creepy.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:13 pmYou folks sure spend a lot of time worrying about other people’s personal behavior…..at least you do when it suits your purposes…
Comment by O. Bigfoot — August 28, 2007 @ 1:07 pm
You guys wrote the book on worrying about other’s sex habits when you crucified Clinton. Everybody knew Bush Sr. had a mistress and left it alone. Now when we play by your rules you’re unhappy. Should think about all the new rules Bushco has put in place cause they’re really going to bite you guys in the ass after the next election.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:13 pmAh, now daryll comes forth. Of course, its man sex time.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:13 pmWe still cannot determine whether or not he was signaling
No, and that’s for the courts to decide.
But if he’s guilty, then shouldn’t he be resigning? Why wait for the good folks of Idaho, whom he was deceiving, to kick his ass out the door??
shane,
August 28th, 2007 at 1:15 pmYou can’t wait for Hillary to be President!
When she really takes away people’s liberties and freedom you will defend her.
Saying it’s for the common good, right?
I think it’s creepy to pay for sex (vitter). A bathroom hook up is not so much creepy as just disgusting. Sex with strangers in dirty places has never appealed to me. I prefer it to be somewhere with clean sheets.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:15 pmWe still cannot determine whether or not he was signaling the agent to complete a sexual act. Maybe he hit his foot accidentally.
Comment by Daryll — August 28, 2007 @ 1:11 pm
Look at Daryll attacking the black man to protect the homosexual activity of his white man. Next to Uncle Tom in the dictionary they’ve got your picture, fool.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:16 pmDaryll,
Jefferson hasn’t been convicted of anything. Craig has been convicted and failed to disclose this to the Senate.
He is a criminal just like Bush both convicted of crimes yet still holding office.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:16 pmHow soon before Sen. Craig checks into rehab? It’s all the rage for perverts and pedophiles, I hear…
August 28th, 2007 at 1:17 pmI can’t wait till Hillary is President.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:18 pmShe’ll run the most honest and open government in history!
She’s a saint!
Poor Larry…he’s been fed to the MSM as a sacrificial victim to knock Gonzo out of the headlines. Think about it–this happened in June. We’re just now hearing about it? Craig will resign after much ado and another Republican will be seated to replace him. After which, we will discover that the surge has been pushed ahead another six months while the media has a frenzy about this “scandal”. CNN didn’t even mention Gonzo resigning until a half-hour into their morning broadcast today. And then they covered it in about a minute of airtime. Nothing to see here.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:18 pmHere is Glenn Greenwalds take on this, well worth reading. Enjoy.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:18 pmhttp://www.glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/
After you click on that, click on the illuminated “here” in the opening sentence, you won’t have to deal with the salon ad stuff.
shane,
You can’t wait for Hillary to be President!
When she really takes away people’s liberties and freedom you will defend her.
Saying it’s for the common good, right?
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nation — August 28, 2007 @ 1:15 pm
I’m an Edwards supporter but my liberties have already been taken away. Personally I’d prefer any Democrat over Hillary, but you keep ranting.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:20 pmWhy did an incident that occurred in June only hit the news today?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:20 pmWhen a Senator is arrested, charged, pleads guilty – isn’t that a news story? Even if it were for jaywalking – isn’t it newsworthy? Or does that only apply to Democrats who go berserk in an airport baggage claim area?
The so-called liberal press – is proven again to be an oxymoron.
Can’t We Trust a U.S. Senator in Our Airport Bathrooms?
August 28th, 2007 – 7:45 AM
Minneapolis/St Paul Star-Tribune
Op/Ed
http://www.startribune.com/blogs/kersten/
….Come, come, Senator, you’re not a Paris Hilton-like babe-in-the-woods. You did whatever you did on June 11th and then had two months to think about it before pleading guilty. You regret your plea now because the press learned of it.
America’s Congressional representatives must be held to the highest standards of public and private conduct. This doesn’t cut it.
We live in an uncertain world. But we at least need the certainty that our airport restrooms are not a threat to the public when occupied by a United States senator.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:20 pmWe still cannot determine whether or not he was signaling the agent to complete a sexual act. Maybe he hit his foot accidentally.
Comment by DaryllofParodyll — August 28, 2007 @ 1:11 pm
Senator Craig pleaded guilty to accidentally playing footsy with the guy in the next stall? Huh.
You’re funny.
Oh, and Joker, nice informative response, as usual. Your intellect and debating skills can only be matched by your expertise on spelling and sentence structure.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:20 pmi thought the feeney post was way better
August 28th, 2007 at 1:21 pmsorry regarding post #45. Still trying to master that “” thingy.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:21 pmHeh
DRxJ,
August 28th, 2007 at 1:22 pmAgain you deny that Hispanics and Italians are treated the worst in American society.
Gays and Muslim sare treated with respect and can’t be insulted.
But it’s ok for racists like you to attack Latins.
You’re a racist slimeball!
CNN didn’t even mention Gonzo resigning until a half-hour into their morning broadcast today. And then they covered it in about a minute of airtime. Nothing to see here.
Comment by Menehune — August 28, 2007 @ 1:18 pm
They had to out this guy, no missing white girls, no bridges collapsing, no hurricane, no coal mine accidents. I’m sure they have a lot more on hold to pull out when they need to cover up something bigger.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:22 pmThere was a huge car accident today.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:24 pmI blame BUsh since he didn’t come and help the people hurt.
You’re a racist slimeball!
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nation are vaginally dry, Joker — August 28, 2007 @ 1:22 pm
Nothing to see here, folks. Just another troll derailment. Keep moving, nothing to see.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:25 pmI blame BUsh since he didn’t come and help the people hurt.
Comment by AlpoNova — August 28, 2007 @ 1:24 pm
Nothing to see here, folks. Move along. Just another off-topic troll derailment. Nothing to see.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:26 pmAh, now daryll comes forth. Of course, its man sex time.
We still cannot determine whether or not he was signaling
No, and that’s for the courts to decide.
But if he’s guilty, then shouldn’t he be resigning? Why wait for the good folks of Idaho, whom he was deceiving, to kick his ass out the door??
Comment by RUCerious — August 28, 2007 @ 1:13 pm
Didn’t Clinton receive a BJ? Didn’t he still remain in office? Also, the next time you are in an airport restroom and you touch another man’s hand while reaching for the paper towels, they should charge you for committing a lewd act, as well.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:27 pm49. I guess it looked pretty bad when CNN took down the “Gonzo resigns” banner after about fifteen minutes to replace it for the rest of the day with the “Michael Vick pleads guilty” story–which everybody knew was going to happen anyway. So they came up with this little “toe-tapper”. It’s got legs, y’know–and feet.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:28 pmOf course he should resign. He should have been outed and banished years ago. What is it with these queers that they think they have to hide behind being conservative or religious? Do they know that their disgusting choice of life style is an abomination and feel the need to hide it? Out them all and treat them like the filthy perverts that they are.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:28 pmDRxJ,
Yeah nothing to see.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:28 pmJust like the other thread where you deny Italians are Latin, right?
they should charge you for committing a lewd act, as well.
Comment byParodyllDaryll — August 28, 2007 @ 1:27 pm
August 28th, 2007 at 1:29 pmThe trolls here are making me laugh – even more than usual today.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:29 pmMenehune,
“CNN took down the “Gonzo resigns†banner ”
I’m glad they did.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:29 pmIt’s a racist statement.
It’s Gonzales.
Why do you Leftist make fun of his name?
Racism I bet!
dammit TP.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:30 pmMy post, which was eaten by the filter du jour, said.
…and of course, you should plead guilty, right parodylldaryll?
You’re funny
Quote: “He’s a Bad Boy, a Naughty Boy,… probably even a nasty, bad, naughty boy.”
Meet The Press, January 24, 1999 Larry Craig, referring to Bill Clinton.
Oh, the irony of it all.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:30 pmWe still cannot determine whether or not he was signaling the agent to complete a sexual act. Maybe he hit his foot accidentally.
Comment by Daryll — August 28, 2007 @ 1:11 pm
Look at Daryll attacking the black man to protect the homosexual activity of his white man. Next to Uncle Tom in the dictionary they’ve got your picture, fool.
Comment by shane — August 28, 2007 @ 1:16 pm
I am not an uncle tom. I AM AN AMERICAN!!!! Not black, african american, etc. Per biblical principles, you are not supposed to judge the Senator. It is up to our glorious judicial system to prosecute and convict him.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:30 pmComment by Almighty Latin Kings Nation — August 28, 2007 @ 1:15 pm
August 28th, 2007 at 1:30 pmComment by Almighty Latin Kings Nation — August 28, 2007 @ 1:15 pm
What’s up, ALKN!?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:31 pmPIP,
August 28th, 2007 at 1:31 pmHomeboy what’s the deal!
What’s popping today?
Daryll,
Jefferson hasn’t been convicted of anything. Craig has been convicted and failed to disclose this to the Senate.
He is a criminal just like Bush both convicted of crimes yet still holding office.
Comment by txexspeedy — August 28, 2007 @ 1:16 pm
Hmmm, you hold one hundred thousand dollars for a year. Ten thousand dollars is missing. Is that a coincidence, I think not.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:32 pmHey as an expert on Greeks and Romans.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:32 pmAre not Italians Latins?
The Leftists here like Shane and DRxJ are claiming they are White anglo Saxons!
He should resign. If he wants to be a political pervert he should join the Democrats.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:32 pmComment by Almighty Latin Kings Nation — August 28, 2007 @ 1:31 pm
Not much, just exposing these leftist traitors before I go to class.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:32 pmJust like the other thread where you deny Italians are Latin, right?
Comment by Almight Latin Kings Nation Jokers — August 28, 2007 @ 1:28 pm
Okay, here’s a challenge with a little wager:
August 28th, 2007 at 1:32 pmLink to where ever I denied Italians are Latin. If you find such a hypothetical post, I will offer an apology, and leave.
If you can’t, you offer an apology, and leave.
Can you handle it?
(oh, link to the actual time and date, please. thanks)
ahh… muy bueno!
you went with english, i see!
now it’s “almighty“…
idjit…
August 28th, 2007 at 1:33 pmIt seems that everybody has weighed in on this except the people whose opinions really matter — the people of Idaho whom he represents.
The biggest reason that Vitter is still in office is that the Louisianans still support him. If Craig has that kind of support from his consituents, then he should stay. If he doesn’t, then he should go.
I don’t live in either Idaho or Louisiana, but if either of these men represented me, I would call for them to step down. Not because of their sex lives, but because of their tendency to preach one thing and practice another.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:33 pmDaryll,
August 28th, 2007 at 1:33 pmOf course t5hese Leftists will call you Uncle Tom.
They are racists.
Any non White person that disagrees with them are out of line in theoir minds!
You must be grateful to your Leftist White Masta!
After Diaper/Dildo David Vitter and Larry Craig, and Bob Allen of Florida, who pretty much did like Craig,
Bill Clinton’s affair with a consensual adult female seems, well, NORMAL.
Especially after these hypocrites…
August 28th, 2007 at 1:34 pmItalians are Latin.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:34 pmdo as i say — don’t do as i doo-doo
August 28th, 2007 at 1:34 pmHe should resign……and he should probably move away from Idaho as well.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:35 pmHere Are The Really Important Questions:
1. If a man goes into a stall and closes the door and presumes he has privacy and masterbates is this an arrestable offense?
2. Are their hidden cameras inside bathroom stalls at airports?
Please Offer Your Answers Here:
paulkylerjr (at) yahoo
August 28th, 2007 at 1:35 pmWhat’s behind the right’s different response to David Vitter’s call girls and Larry Craig’s boy trouble? In a nutshell, the boys.
For the details, see:
August 28th, 2007 at 1:35 pm“Behind the Right’s Double Standard on Craig and Vitter.”
FOLEY: get a ruler and measure your stance for me
Troll: ive already told you that
FOLEY: tell me again
Troll: 7 and 1/2
FOLEY: ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm beautiful
August 28th, 2007 at 1:35 pmCraig should RESIGN. PERIOD. These people do NOT represent the Republican Party – not one I will ever be sending $$ to.
Unlike Democrats, we will not sit back and crow that this his personal life (and the MSM won’t be our echo chamber). When there evidence of law-breaking, even if it’s “just all about sex”, we will demand resignation. While he’s at it, take Hastert (for the Foley coverup) and Vitter with him.
This is not Bill Clinton’s party. We will not be hijacked by a phony bunch of moralists who beg for sex in airline restrooms!!! AND to Bill Clinton’s credit, even he never plead guilty to such a swarmy charge.
Larry Craig is a PIG!!!
August 28th, 2007 at 1:35 pmPer biblical principles, you are not supposed to judge the Senator.
Comment by DarylltheParodyll — August 28, 2007 @ 1:32 pm
Just like you’ve never judged me for marrying a divorced woman?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:35 pmyou’re funny
off topic, but who would want to sign up for the job where you sat on an airport crapper all day waiting for perverted republicans to solicit you?
I can only imagine the small talk when this guy gets home:
Wife: “hi honey, how was your day?”
Cop: “well aside from the fact I had to sit on a toilet in a public restroom in a major airport all day listening to people take $hits, I would say it was great. And yours?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:36 pm#79 – what’s behind the left’s hypocrisy on Clinton and Vitter???
I am not a hypocrite. I have stated that Vitter and Craig should BOTH resign.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:36 pmthis is so friggin’ priceless:
you are just too ignorant and uneducated to understand this.
poor Liberals just lack of education. sad, truly sad.
Comment by why Joker, why? — August 28, 2007 @ 11:50 am
Preceded by this:
You moron, Rudy Giuliani is for Latin descent
Really, I don’t even need to comment.
Comment by DRxJ — August 28, 2007 @ 11:55 am
DRxJ.
You deny Rudy is Latin?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:36 pm59. That’s it–I’m racist. I hate all crazy Haole boys. Ya got me pegged.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:36 pmomnipotens latin regis regnum, assholum est
August 28th, 2007 at 1:36 pmPaul,
The guy wanted to involve another person in his sexual gratification, that seems to be a tipping point. If he was masturbating alone, probably wouldn’t have been an issue, if he was discreet about it.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:36 pmDidn’t Clinton receive a BJ? Didn’t he still remain in office? Also, the next time you are in an airport restroom and you touch another man’s hand while reaching for the paper towels, they should charge you for committing a lewd act, as well.
Comment by Daryll — August 28, 2007 @ 1:27 pm
Wow Daryll, are you getting in touch with your feminine side. Here’s something to think about. When boys are 10, 11 and 12 they don’t want to go in the ladies room with their mothers and have to go into the men’s room at airports alone most of the time. Do mothers have to let their sons pee in a cup because even Senators can’t keep it zipped in public restrooms?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:37 pmFOLEY: get a ruler and measure your stance for me
Troll: ive already told you that
FOLEY: tell me again
Troll: 7 and 1/2
FOLEY: ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm beautiful
Comment by troqua
Right, I forgot…
After PEDOPHILE Foley and Dildo/Diaper Vitter and Bob Allen and Larry Craig (all R’s),
Bill Clinton’s consensual affair with an ADULT FEMALE DEFINITELY seems NORMAL…
August 28th, 2007 at 1:37 pmYou deny Rudy is Latin?
Comment by Aryan Latin Kings Nation Hates All — August 28, 2007 @ 1:36 pm
BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
August 28th, 2007 at 1:38 pmWrong answer.
You claimed I denied that Italians were Latin. This is not even the same subject.
You lose.
Now leave, as per wager
“Didn’t Clinton receive a BJ? Didn’t he still remain in office?”
From a consenting adult woman. And he was impeached for it by the hypocritical perverted right wing conservatives in your party. He didn’t solicict sex from a random member of his own gender in a public place. I guess that’s the difference between republicans and democrats…
August 28th, 2007 at 1:38 pmIt’s all the rage for perverts and pedophiles, I hear…
Comment by toasterhead — August 28, 2007 @ 1:17 pm
—-
You heard from a little boy you were molesting? You pervert!
August 28th, 2007 at 1:39 pmActually, Daryll, the Bible says we’re supposed to judge those “inside the church”. So if Craig identifies himself as a Christian, it’s our duty to expell him from our ranks.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:39 pm#88 – if he was jacking off in public, I think it would be an issue.
I just don’t get with these sicko Republicans. These are not the people I know and deal with. But, I guess in the end, the MSM can have tout their “Republicans are a bunch of a closet case pedophiles” line, but hey, at least we’re not Democrats who cheer for Al Qaeda!
August 28th, 2007 at 1:39 pmThe Leftist in America.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:39 pmThe modern KKK with a twist of Stalinism!
Daryll, go here:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/0828071craig1.html
Craig was hunting for man on man action. defending him only shows the blindness you have and that all others here know so well.
Craig pled guilty. He had his day in court. Accept this or not. It’s still the truth.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:39 pmI’m racist.
Comment by Menehune — August 28, 2007 @ 1:36 pm
—–
FU then, b!tch!!!
August 28th, 2007 at 1:40 pmO. BIGFOOT: You sure as hell worried about Clinton’s Personal Problem.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:40 pmOkay, we’re getting side tracked here by Joker, Joker, JOKER! (myself included)
Back on topic,
August 28th, 2007 at 1:40 pmWhy would anyone plead guilty to an act they didn’t commit, especially a lewd one?
But, but, James K. Polk was effeminate.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:40 pmDaryll,
Of course t5hese Leftists will call you Uncle Tom.
They are racists.
Any non White person that disagrees with them are out of line in theoir minds!
You must be grateful to your Leftist White Masta!
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nation — August 28, 2007 @ 1:33 pm
Almighty, liberals have always had negative sentiments toward minorities who are conservatives. Liberals supported slavery and segregation, Republicans abolished it.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:40 pmDRxJ the Racist Leftist,
August 28th, 2007 at 1:40 pmYou deny Rudy is Latin.
By stating you won’t comment on it, you deny it!
Dismissed!
The Leftist in America.
The modern KKK with a twist of Stalinism!
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nation — August 28, 2007 @ 1:39 pm
————
100% True!
August 28th, 2007 at 1:40 pmIt is up to our glorious judicial system to prosecute and convict him.
Comment by Daryll — August 28, 2007 @ 1:30 pm
He pled guilty, Daryll. What part of that is confusing to you. And Jefferson is still awaiting trial, but you have him convicted already.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:40 pm#92 – Clinton was accused of rape by one woman and sexual harrassment by at least two. He lied under oath and obstructed justice – that is why he was impeached. Please don’t be a hypocrite like Larry Craig.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:40 pmWhy do leftists hate Jews and Christians?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:42 pmDaryll,
August 28th, 2007 at 1:42 pmThe KKK was the terror arm of the democratic Party.
No wonder they support groups lilke Hizb’Allah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, The Muslim Brotherhood Hizb’Al Tihib, Al-Qaeda in Iraq and regimes like Iran, Saudi Arabia and Syria!
Kindred spirits stick together!
Back on topic,
Why would anyone plead guilty to an act they didn’t commit, especially a lewd one?
Comment by DRxJ — August 28, 2007 @ 1:40 pm
#
Better question:
August 28th, 2007 at 1:42 pmWhy would anyone with this much legal education and legislative experience do such a thing?
By stating you won’t comment on it, you deny it!
Dismissed!
Comment by Almighty Labia Kings Nation — August 28, 2007 @ 1:40 pm
I accept your admittence of defeat, and await you absence.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:42 pmfor once, man up.
thank you, and we’ll see you here tomorrow
Per biblical principles, you are not supposed to judge the Senator.
Comment by DarylltheParodyll — August 28, 2007 @ 1:32 pm
Just like you’ve never judged me for marrying a divorced woman?
you’re funny
Comment by DRxJ — August 28, 2007 @ 1:35 pm
I was spiritually witnessing to you. It’s not my fault that the bible prohibits your act. Blame Jesus.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:42 pmLarry Craig is a PIG!!!
Comment by Hillary Whacked Vince
And so are you for continuing to lie about Vince Foster’s death. People like you drove him to commit suicide and you have so little shame, conscience and honor that you continue, (what has it been 15 years?) to smear the living with your own horror. That is the difference between democrats and republicans.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:43 pmNeocons go down on AQ.
Bush gets wood just thinking about OBL. For Bush, it’s the hunt that makes lil bush tingle. Actually catching OBL would just be a let down.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:43 pmDaryll. What part of that is confusing to you.
Comment by shane — August 28, 2007 @ 1:40 pm
You know, the pleading stuff.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:43 pmHis only context would be begging and pleading his wife to stop.
Swifty,
You should’ve seen the other thread.
I had Leftists denying the Rudy who is Sicilian is Latin!
They then claimed that Italians are Anglo-White!
They denied the Romans were Latins.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:44 pmYou know the Romans called themselves Latins!
You would of loved the post!
Interesting article in the Idaho Statesman newspaper about the long history of accusations against Senator Craig over the years about his alleged homosexuality, including allegations of previous sexual encounters with men in public restrooms.
There’s also his involvement in the 1982 Congressional Page scandal and alleged pedophilia.
http://www.idahostatesman.com/eyepiece/story/143801.html
August 28th, 2007 at 1:44 pmI was spiritually witnessing to you. It’s not my fault that the bible prohibits your act. Blame Jesus.
Comment by DaryllParodyll — August 28, 2007 @ 1:42 pm
Just as soon as you Blame Jesus for you homosexual tendencies.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:44 pmYou’re funny
I was spiritually witnessing to you. It’s not my fault that the bible prohibits your act. Blame Jesus.
Comment by Daryll
You’d be better off worrying about your own soul, the moment you voted for bush in 04 you bought your ticket to hell.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:44 pmBetter question:
Why would anyone with this much legal education and legislative experience do such a thing?
Comment by Chris L — August 28, 2007
Even better question:
Why would a LAWmaker say in hindsight he should have gotten counsel to defend him against a criminal charge?
gee, ya think?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:45 pmGod says you can’t marry a divorced woman? Why would god create divorce then? Your saying god didn’t create divorce? Can a divorced man marry again? Is it OK if he marries a divorced woman?
Daryll please enlighten, enquiring minds want to know.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:45 pmDRxJ,
August 28th, 2007 at 1:45 pmYou’re lucky this is the internet.
If in real life you insulted a member of the Almighty Latin Kings and queens Nations you’d be sliced!
Be careful when you diss the Kings!
Actually, Daryll, the Bible says we’re supposed to judge those “inside the churchâ€. So if Craig identifies himself as a Christian, it’s our duty to expell him from our ranks.
Comment by Kiki — August 28, 2007 @ 1:39 pm
Not as long as he seeks forgiveness. Will you forgive him?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:45 pmQuote: “He’s a Bad Boy, a Naughty Boy,… probably even a nasty, bad, naughty boy.â€
Meet The Press, January 24, 1999 Larry Craig, referring to Bill Clinton.
As he was pleasing himself and Timmeh under the table.
Really though you Conservo’s are really dense, I mean the Clinton years are gone but it’s like they never left, only the names and letters have changed (D-R).
I know some of you have a hard time of accepting the fact that alot of your leaders are gay, but hey get over it and the world will be a better place. Let’s ask Mary Cheney what she thinks about all the self-hating gays in the Repuppetcan party. Ooops better not Dick might get mad or she might get made and say that John Edwards took a cheap shot.
Hypocrites, idiots all of you.
It is time that the word Conservative become just as nasty as they have made the word liberal. Though they have been successful with the help of the fright winged press, the facts about those who call themselves Conservatives will be enough to make anyone who considers themselves such hide in the closet like their Anti-Gay (in public) Gay leaders.
” We’re not gay, not that there’s anything wrong with that” Seinfeld
August 28th, 2007 at 1:46 pm#112 – Vince Foster was murdered and don’t you dare talk about people like me driving him to suicide. By those rules, if Karl Rove or Gonzo offed himself tomorrow, would that be your fault????
Vince Foster was murdered and the msm and Ken Starr covered it up.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:46 pmThe American Left
August 28th, 2007 at 1:46 pmtheir KKK and Stalinist forefathers would be proud!
If in real life you insulted a member of the Almighty Latin Kings and queens Nations you’d be sliced!
Ooooh, we’re so askeert!
August 28th, 2007 at 1:46 pmGo hose yourself down, jackass.
Almighty Latin Kings Nation,
The Leftists will lie about anything they can!
That’s the only thing they know how to do.
When a lefty says that he is a patriot, you know that he is a traitor!!!
I have to go now, but I will be back smacking these traitors later on tonight!!!
GOD BLESS The UNITED STATES of AMERICA!!!
DEATH TO ISLAMOSTALINISM!!!
August 28th, 2007 at 1:46 pmComment by katy #19
It’s not up to the police officer involved to expose this incident to the public…
…OR offer commentary on it one way or the other…
…the officer performed his duty…
…as for the MSM…
…they’ve acted as they’ve done from day one of the Greedy Old Perverts’ rise to power…
…a day late and BILLIONS of dollars short…
…on bringing the conned’selfservative Larry Craig’s perversion to the public’s attention…
…I suspect Mitt(ens) KNEW about this and was hoping it wouldn’t find the light of day…
…after all…
…ALL conned’selfservatives are hypocrites and “closet” people anyway…
…seriously!
August 28th, 2007 at 1:47 pmChill, brah. Trollz be crazy today.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:47 pmNot as long as he seeks forgiveness. Will you forgive him?
Comment byParodyllDaryll — August 28, 2007 @ 1:45 pm
About the same time you forgive Clinton.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:48 pmYou’re funny
Back at ya.
False impersonation isn’t tolerated by them either.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:49 pmSwifty the Boat (PiP),
August 28th, 2007 at 1:49 pmThat’s why Leftists hate Latins like me who knoe that it was my ancestors that save White Europe from an Islamic takeover.
Their mad at us for stopping their Muslim Homeboys and have removed from American History books the story of the Latin people’s struggle against Islamic Imperialism.
They lie to us about our part.
That’s why I hate Leftists!
wait, wait….why are Liberals going after a homosexual senator.
I thought we are suppose to embrace and accept this type of behavior? I thought this type of behavior was normal….
I guess it is only normal when done by Democrats and Liberals, but abnormal when done by Republicans and Conservatives…well of course according to Liberals.
It never fails the hate that comes from the left towards homosexuals that are Republicans.
sad, sad.
Sen. Craig was just behaviong like eveyr single San Francisco homosexual.
and what Liberals don’t want to talk about is how Sen. Craig was caught.
The airport that he was at was having trouble with the men’s bathrooms. Men were going there to rape other men, to have gay sex and they were disturbing and pushing their behavior literally on other men. So the airport police created an undercover task force to get these homosexuals.
Sen. Craig just turned out to be one of them.
In fact, this is something that is happening accrosso the nation. Homosexual men using public bathrooms to rape other men, and to have sex.
My friends that are cops and work the beach beats say that they are arresting homosexual men at an alarming rate for public sex in beach bathrooms. The sad part is that Liberal homosexual groups are calling these arrests homophobic.
so, was Sen. Craig’s arrest also homophobic?
Liberal=hypocrisy.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:49 pmI was spiritually witnessing to you. It’s not my fault that the bible prohibits your act. Blame Jesus.
Comment by Daryll — August 28, 2007 @ 1:42 pm
But the bible advocates soliciting sex from another man in a public restroom where children are regularly present. Have you seen how many children are at airports?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:49 pmWhy is Joker, Joker, JOKER still posting here?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:49 pmI thought he was man enough to admit defeat, and humbly leave for the day.
Anyone wishing to engage in Aryan Knights of Columbus, or whatever he’s posting as, just remember his poor loser status.
I miss the good old days …
… when The Joker was banned and Mr Pee didn’t defend him.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:50 pmDRxJ,
You’re lucky this is the internet.
If in real life you insulted a member of the Almighty Latin Kings and queens Nations you’d be sliced!
Be careful when you diss the Kings!
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nation
Likewise, moron. If a real Latin King caught a poser like you, you’d be dead and floating in the Chicago River.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:50 pmFalse impersonation isn’t tolerated by them either.
Oh yeah, I am a member of the Kings!
You fool.
Corazon Del Rey!
I became one in NY and when I moved th FL I linked up with my Hermanos down here.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:51 pmDon’t speak what you don’t know about!
I thought we are suppose to embrace and accept this type of behavior? I thought this type of behavior was normal….
Dense, so dense, aren’t you?
THAT type of behavior is NEVER tolerated. What if had been a child he was “rubbing”?
Wake up.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:51 pmThe Gospels repeatedly warn of people like Larry Craig, David Vitter, Mark Foley, Dennis Hastert (sticking with the sexual hypocrisy theme).
August 28th, 2007 at 1:51 pmYou should’ve seen the other thread.
I had Leftists denying the Rudy who is Sicilian is Latin!
They then claimed that Italians are Anglo-White!
They denied the Romans were Latins.
You know the Romans called themselves Latins!
You would of loved the post!
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nation — August 28, 2007 @ 1:44 pm
My mother is 100% Sicilian and doesn’t consider herself “latin”. Did Spain invade Sicily. Did Spain invade Italy? If so when?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:52 pmso, was Sen. Craig’s arrest also homophobic?
Liberal=hypocrisy.
Comment by vaginally dry — August 28, 2007 @ 1:49 pm
Nothing to see here, folks. Just another non sensical troll derailment.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:52 pmMove along, nothing to see
…they’ve acted as they’ve done from day one of the Greedy Old Perverts’ rise to power…
…a day late and BILLIONS of dollars short…
…on bringing the conned’selfservative Larry Craig’s perversion to the public’s attention…
…I suspect Mitt(ens) KNEW about this and was hoping it wouldn’t find the light of day…
…after all…
…ALL conned’selfservatives are hypocrites and “closet†people anyway…
…seriously!
Comment by big papa — August 28, 2007 @ 1:47 pm
hmmmm….Hello!!! Sen. Craig just acted like every single San Fran. homosexual. In fact a Florida Mayor, a Democrat by the way, is in the fight of his life in his Florida city against homosexuals because he has ordered his police force to arrest homosexuals who are using public bathrooms to have sex.
Homosexual groups have flocked to the city to protest the arrests as homophobia.
so if you consider Sen. Craigs behavior amoral, perverted, etc, I hope that you are against homosexuals protesting the arrests accross the nation for the same thing.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:52 pmso, was Sen. Craig’s arrest also homophobic?
Liberal=hypocrisy.
Comment by vaginally dry — August 28, 2007 @ 1:49 pm
Nothing to see here, folks. Just another non sensical troll derailment.
Move along, nothing to see
Comment by DRxJ — August 28, 2007 @ 1:52 pm
So, you can’t answer to the facts, eh?
Homosexual groups in Florida are protesting a Mayor, who is a Democrat, for ording arrests of homosexuals who are behaving like Sen. Craig did. These groups have labeled the mayor a homophobe.
Is Sen. Craig’s arrest do to homophobia? According to the Liberal homosexual groups around the country, yes.
right? c’mon little DRxJ……you must have a higher IQ than what you have shown so far.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:54 pmDRxJ,
“Aryan Knights of Columbus”
Critofero Columbo was Italian you moron!
Again your racist ignorant views are on display!
Thanks for proving my point!
Bobwurst,
I was recruited in NY and now reside in FL.
I still attend meetings and planning for community empowerment!
You know nothing about us whiteboy.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:54 pmSo silence.
so if you consider Sen. Craigs behavior amoral, perverted, etc, I hope that you are against homosexuals protesting the arrests accross the nation for the same thing.
Comment by why
So why are you defending Craig?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:54 pmAt one point in history, Romans ruled much of europe, so every european must be latin.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:54 pmDufus. or, is the plural Dufi?
Comment by Almight Latin Kings Nation
Your words are meaningless here.
You’re a proven liar.
Where’s the “troll-off” spray?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:55 pmCan we just start calling them “The Blowjob Party”? I mean, how many more closet-case disasters is it going to take?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:55 pm.
You know nothing about us whiteboy.
So silence.
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nations
August 28th, 2007 at 1:56 pmBite me moron.
Mr/Mrs Why,
This was directed at YOU-
Dense, so dense, aren’t you?
THAT type of behavior is NEVER tolerated. What if had been a child he was “rubbing�
Wake up.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:56 pmOoooh, we’re so askeert!
Go hose yourself down, jackass.
Comment by RUCerious — August 28, 2007 @ 1:46 pm
Geez, we better stay out of Miami. Oh, I’ve been doing that for about 40 years now, shouldn’t be a problem.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:56 pmhmmmm….Hello!!! Sen. Craig just acted like every single San Fran. homosexual.
How? By voting the anti-gay “family values” line while living a secret life? Uh, no. The trolls aren’t getting the hypocrisy angle. The GOP’s whole family values schtick is dying a slow, humiliating death.
First Rove the atheist, now this.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:57 pm.
Shane,
You mother is the type was brainwashed into thinking she’s not Latin.
“Did Spain invade Sicily. Did Spain invade Italy? If so when?
Yes.
Pedro of aragon drove the FRench Angevins out of Sicily in 1282 during the war of the Sicilian Vespers.
The Aragonses Spanish were viewed as liberators.
Spain defeated and drove the French out of Italy between 1503 and 1529.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:57 pmThey controlled most of Italy until the 1700’s.
“The Blowjob Party�
Or perhaps the
Gimme Oral Party…
August 28th, 2007 at 1:57 pmright? c’mon little DRxJ……you must have a higher IQ than what you have shown so far.
Comment byJoker Aryan Nation’s are vaginally dry, why? — August 28, 2007 @ 1:54 pm
I thought you’d be man enough to leave after you lost our little wager.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:57 pmI thought wrong
You know nothing about us whiteboy.
OK, so tell me about yourself, whiteboy.
Alternately, you could learn how to use a comma.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:57 pm.
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nation — August 28, 2007 @ 1:22 pm
Please try not to litter this thread with the “liberals are racists” drumbeat as you and “why” did in the Gonzales grammar thread. Not only is it off-topic, it doesn’t become fact if you post it X number of times.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:58 pmHey Latin pendaho,
Isn’t recess over by now?
August 28th, 2007 at 1:58 pmI thought we are suppose to embrace and accept this type of behavior? I thought this type of behavior was normal….
Dense, so dense, aren’t you?
THAT type of behavior is NEVER tolerated. What if had been a child he was “rubbing�
Wake up.
Comment by RepublicansAreFascists — August 28, 2007 @ 1:51 pm
So what you are saying that Justice Ginsburg comment that the consensual age should be 12 is perverted and abnormal, right?
and that Holland, one of the favorite places of Liberals, which has a law making consensual sex age 12 is perverted and abnormal.
and that the groups protesting the Flordia city are a bunch of perverts too, right?
becausee I get it, but Liberals around the world don’t. they don’t believe this is perverted behavior. They embrace this behavior and claim that you are closed minded if youd on’t accepted.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:59 pmComment by Hillary Whacked Vince
But who did Laura kill?
You know what I am so tired of this Hillary and Bill Clinton killed Vince Foster stuff. So now I’ve decided to do something about it, until you provide PROOF not theory or conspiracy but PROOF, I will post this under your moniker everytime I see you.
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3910b26e685a.htm
August 28th, 2007 at 1:59 pmMy mother is 100% Sicilian and doesn’t consider herself “latinâ€. Did Spain invade Sicily. Did Spain invade Italy? If so when?
Comment by shane — August 28, 2007 @ 1:52 pm
Look up the “Hapsburg Empire” Shane. I will answer why’s psuedo question. I don’t think people should be having sex in public restrooms, so no I don’t think the mayor down in Florida should be run out of town. Sex between adults in privacy is one thing, but spilling over into public view is in my opinion intolerable. I would like to take my kids to the park without worrying about them seeing that kind of activity.
August 28th, 2007 at 1:59 pmmissmolly,
August 28th, 2007 at 1:59 pmwhy and Aryan Nation of Knight Almight (or whatever) are just the Joker.
Please try not to litter this thread with the “liberals are racists†drumbeat as you and “why†did in the Gonzales grammar thread. Not only is it off-topic, it doesn’t become fact if you post it X number of times.
Comment by missmolly — August 28, 2007 @ 1:58 pm
but Liberals are racist. You and I know it! :)
August 28th, 2007 at 1:59 pmFirst Rove the atheist, now this.
.
Comment by Grand Moff Texan — August 28, 2007 @ 1:57 pm
how easily the left wing ‘tards are fooled by the Liberal and Democratic machine.
idiots
August 28th, 2007 at 2:00 pmShane,
Actually the Romans settled Spain and we got our Latin culture and heritage from Italians.
Shane you’re mom is ignorant of her own history!
August 28th, 2007 at 2:01 pmProduct of Democratic brainwashing!
Moron #1: Hey, let’s pretend to be latin and go hijack some TP threads.
Moron #2: why?
Moron #1: It’s fun.
Moron #2: k. lolz
August 28th, 2007 at 2:03 pmKrazny,
“Look up the “Hapsburg Empire†Shane.”
Thank you.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:03 pmIt funny that only people on the Right now about Imperial Spain.
Yet the Leftists don’t know that and view us as helpless victims.
It shows you the real racists!
how easily the left wing ‘tards are fooled by the Liberal and Democratic machine.
idiots
Right, ’cause a self-professed atheist like Karl Rove just plain using the Christianist vote like a 20 dollar whore is all a Liberal and Democratic conspiracy, right?
August 28th, 2007 at 2:03 pm.
#92 – Clinton was accused of rape by one woman and sexual harrassment by at least two. He lied under oath and obstructed justice – that is why he was impeached. Please don’t be a hypocrite like Larry Craig.
Comment by Hillary Whacked Vince
You hypocrites spent 10 years and 80 million dollars invetigating every aspect of Bill Clinton’s life, if the accusations of rape and sexual harrasment had ANY validity to them Clinton would have been brought to trial by Starr. The charges of obstrtuction of Justice charge was thrown out of court when the judge, a conservative judge ruled that the lie was not germaine to case. He was impeached in the Senate and was found not guilty by the republicans. The reason you have such an offenisive screen name is you are a whiny hypocritical republican troll.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:05 pmReally, REALLY dense:
YES, idiot. Wanting to f*ck little boys/girls is wrong. What the hell’s wrong with you???
August 28th, 2007 at 2:06 pmComment by Almighty Latin Kings Nation
Sounds like a Samba band!!!
August 28th, 2007 at 2:06 pm#92 – Clinton was accused of rape by one woman…
Yes, a woman who also swore under oath that Clinton didn’t rape her.
I’m sorry, which version of her story are you talking about? Do you even know?
August 28th, 2007 at 2:07 pm.
Shane you’re mom is ignorant of her own history!
Product of Democratic brainwashing!
Comment by Almighty Latin King Nations — August 28, 2007 @ 2:01 pm
If you yell it, it must be true.
I think you’re out of your league w/ this
new moniker. I’ve known some “Folks” in my time…
You sound familiar, but not in a folksy way.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:08 pmThe racists on this thread like Shane( the self denying 1/2 Latin, DRxJ and Bobwurst prove that today’s Left can’t accepy Latins who know their history and don’t view themselves as victims.
The Imperial Spanish Tercios stepped all over White Europeans why should I bow before their Leftist KKK Stalinist offsprings?They’re mad I know this!
August 28th, 2007 at 2:09 pmhow easily the left wing ‘tards are fooled by the Liberal and Democratic machine. -Why
Actually, the unelected right wingers have been fooled for some time by the GOP. The list has grown by 7 since Mark Foley, heres two recent additions;
* Republican legislator Ted Klaudt was charged with raping girls under the age of 16.
* Republican city councilman Joseph Monteleone Jr. was found guilty of fondling underage girls.
I also recall that Scanlon and Reed calling the religious right ‘Wackos’. Wake up PIP. Either your a part of the big lie or your fooled.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:09 pmThank you.
It funny that only people on the Right now about Imperial Spain.
Yet the Leftists don’t know that and view us as helpless victims.
It shows you the real racists!
Comment by Almighty Latin King Nations — August 28, 2007 @ 2:03 pm
If you think I am a crazed righty, then you haven’t been paying attention. I am a student of history.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:10 pmso if you consider Sen. Craigs behavior amoral, perverted, etc, I hope that you are against homosexuals protesting the arrests accross the nation for the same thing.
Comment by why — August 28, 2007 @ 1:52 pm
As far as Craig himself goes — I object to his condemnation of adultery and homosexuality while practicing it, but I’m really not interested in his sex life.
Regarding the protests of similar arrests across the country — I am against restroom sting operations such as the one that caught Craig. I would think the police would have better things to do than sit in a restroom stall and wait to be “signaled”.
If sexual activity in a particular men’s room has become a nuisance, I support some monitoring — preferably by posting a very visible uniformed officer, just as you would to eliminate any nuisance in the community.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:10 pm“I’ve known some “Folks†in my time…”
They’re a rival group.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:10 pmA product of Leftist brainwashing and ignorance.
we’ve kicked their asses in many cities!
Almight Latin Kings Nations
Yeah right, and a violent street gang is SO different from a terrorist group HOW??????????????????????
August 28th, 2007 at 2:10 pmwe’ve kicked their asses in many cities!
Comment by Almight Latin Kings Nations — August 28, 2007 @ 2:10 pm
hmm, and why was that?
August 28th, 2007 at 2:11 pmLets not forget, that the Latins were stepped on by the Moors, North African Muslims for a few generations, until the Christian Church decided to run them out of Spain.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:11 pmSo what you are saying that Justice Ginsburg comment that the consensual age should be 12 is perverted and abnormal, right?
No, I’m saying it’s an urban myth. In fact, Ginsburg never addressed the age of consent clause of the bill in question.
No wonder people like Karl Rove can just use you idiots.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:12 pm.
Shane,
Read this
http://www.sicilianculture.com/news/2002-sicilian.htm
“The growing cigar industry offered the possibility of work that Italians and other immigrants sought. The last decade of the 19th century witnessed an influx of immigrants, the majority of whom gathered in Ybor City and West Tampa (see Appendix I—Map 2), where they formed a multiethnic community of Spaniards born mainly in Asturias and Galicia, Cubans, Afro-Cubans and Italians.[3] Its members came to be known as Tampa Latins.[4] The hostility of the Anglos may have initially united a somewhat insular Latin community (Mormino and Pozzetta 91–92), “
August 28th, 2007 at 2:13 pm“Almight Latin Kings Nations
Yeah right, and a violent street gang is SO different from a terrorist group HOW??????????????????????
Comment by RepublicansAreFascists ”
August 28th, 2007 at 2:13 pmWasn’t jose Padilla a Latin King? Shouldn’t you and all your hommies be in Gitmo right about now?
holy crap… ed is using his one-time platform on c-span to do a MAJOR call-out of hannity… called him a liar and again challenged hannity to put him on his show… c-span should have the video… it was cool…
sorry ’bout the OT … carry on…
August 28th, 2007 at 2:13 pm.
Comment by why #143
I am FOR the arrest and prosecution of ANYONE (homo or heterosexual)…
…engaging in sexual conduct in PUBLIC places…
…especially in airport (or any other public) restrooms…
…and I’d like to see ALL conned’selfservative hypocrites…
…like Larry Craig, Bush, Cheney and anyone who supports and identify with them…
…DESTROYED (in every way possible)…
…period…
August 28th, 2007 at 2:14 pmLeft can’t accepy Latins who know their history and don’t view themselves as victims.
The left doesn’t see latinos [Hispanics] as victims. Mexico is one messed up poor corrupt country, who wouldn’t want to look for a way out? They are victims of their own country not of America[n's]
Besides that this thread isn’t about Latinos.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:14 pmWake up! I hope you don’t get paid for your trolling on this one! “Leftwing bloggers” — You just called Michelle Malkin a left-wing blogger??????!!!!!! and the rest of you let him get away with it!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! I Love it!! That’s the best joke I’ve heard for a while! Oh! hahahahahahhahahhahaha!
August 28th, 2007 at 2:14 pmOk, I have the scoop. I just got off the phone with Jesus, he was waiting for his plane in Baltimore. He said that he saw the whole thing and that Craig is and has been taking it in the butt for years.
Jesus says that doesn’t bother Him, He even tried it a couple of times but He prefers straight sex. He was really pissed at the hypocrisy of it all. If you prefer gay sex, just do it, He said, just don’t go off abusing His name and damning the same action.
He specifically mentioned the poster who shows up on TP anytime the subject is man on man sex and Xians.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:14 pmKrazny,
“Lets not forget, that the Latins were stepped on by the Moors, North African Muslims for a few generations,”
Yeah we turned the tables on them and liberated our country!
My point being is that us Latins don’t are not helpless victims but a proud people with great culture and history!
August 28th, 2007 at 2:15 pmComment by katy #186
…I’d bet everything I own…
…that the COWARD and TRAITOR…
…Sean Hannity…
…won’t accept Schultz’ challenge…
August 28th, 2007 at 2:16 pmWasn’t jose Padilla a Latin King? Shouldn’t you and all your hommies be in Gitmo right about now?
Nope, when he betrayed his race by becoming Muslim he no longer was a King.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:17 pmMuslims are the traditional enemy of the Latin people.
He’s not recognized and was dropped.
He got what he desrve for being a wannabe arab!
Comment by Laura Killed her Boyfriend
Nice try Vince
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3910b26e685a.htm
August 28th, 2007 at 2:17 pm“My point being is that us Latins don’t are not helpless victims but a proud people with great culture and history!
Comment by Almight Latin Kings ”
What does this have to do with a childish poser who wishes he was tough enough to be a street gang and deal drugs and shoot innocent bystanders?
August 28th, 2007 at 2:17 pmComment by Almight Latin Kings Nations
August 28th, 2007 at 2:18 pmReally, I think your just Mr P posing as a Latino, again.
Krany,
August 28th, 2007 at 2:20 pmWell if your a Lefty then I you’re one of the few that knows about the 2nd glorious epic of Latin power, the 1st being Rome.
I bet you’re not even that mush of a Lefty but a Moderate.
Either way I respect you.
Most of these Leftists don’t know about that era as politiucally it’s not convenient to tell Hispanics the truth!
The Imperial Spanish Tercios stepped all over White Europeans why should I bow before their Leftist KKK Stalinist offsprings?They’re mad I know this!
Incoherent rant much?
August 28th, 2007 at 2:21 pmWhat does this have to do with a childish poser who wishes he was tough enough to be a street gang and deal drugs and shoot innocent bystanders?
Comment by Laura Killed her Boyfriend — August 28, 2007 @ 2:17 pm
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA…
Still waitin’ fer tha answer, Laura? Tick tock… tick tock… tick tock…
Well?
August 28th, 2007 at 2:22 pmGod says you can’t marry a divorced woman? Why would god create divorce then? Your saying god didn’t create divorce? Can a divorced man marry again? Is it OK if he marries a divorced woman?
Daryll please enlighten, enquiring minds want to know.
Comment by hellinabucket — August 28, 2007 @ 1:45 pm
Divorce was not created by God, but if a spouse is caught committing adultery then the husband/wife can divorce that person. The wife nor husband can re-marry because they are bound until one dies.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:23 pmThe racists on this thread like Shane( the self denying 1/2 Latin, DRxJ and Bobwurst.
Comment by Almight Latin Kings Nations Love Joker’s tiny member — August 28, 2007 @ 2:09 pm
Last chance at redemption.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:23 pmShow me, anywhere, where I’ve posted a racist remark, or proven myself to be racist. I’ve been posting here for about a year, so you’ll have plenty of threads to dissect.
Take your time, but leave once you don’t find any.
.
Wow, haven’t heard or seen Ari Fleischer for a long time…
It’s like he all of a sudden popped out of the closet.
Opps…was the a Fruedian slip?
Or does Rove have dirt on him?
Just a thought.
.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:23 pmComment by Almight Latin Kings Nations
Bro I was with you and was feelin what you were saying until you went with the betraying his race and wannabe arab stuff.
There are more CHINESE and ASIAN MUSLIMS than there are ARABS PERIOD. The Arab influence comes from the word and geography.
As a proud Bla-Cubano (Bronx, NY babbee) I applaud your pride, but dont use it to put down someone else.
My family consists of Blacks, Whites, Hispanics of both races, Christians, Muslims, Somoans, Irish, we are a site at the family reunion lol.
So ease up papi, do your thing without the insults.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:24 pmLaura Killed her Boyfriend,
I grew up in NY in the Late 80’s early 90’s. That where I was recruited.
I did hustle and hang out on the bloks.
I then moved to Florida and linked up with members down here.
However that was long ago.
I know have a good job and one of the Kings reforming the orginaztion away from a gang and towards a Latin Community Organization.
I think your just Mr P posing as a Latino, again.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:24 pmNope.
I’, the real deal.
I’m Spaniard/Dominican/Italian/Puerto-Rican with Cuban and Colombian relatives.
Soy Latino 100% Demonio Anglo!
Comment by Almight Latin Kings Nations #191
…more light needs to be shed on the Moors’ occupation of the Iberian Peninsula…
…to educate people on the GOOD and bad…
…there were many GREAT Moorish (African) contributions to the European peoples and countries under Moorish control from the 7th to the 14th centuries…
…racist European revisionists are loath to honestly discuss the pitiful,uncivilized state of the Europeans BEFORE the Moors…
…under the German Visigoths and other (European) savages…
…and the murderous reign of Isabella and Ferdinand (and other Christian barbarians)…
…during the Middle Ages AFTER the fall of the Moors…
…because of the treachery of the Jews, European mixed races et al…
August 28th, 2007 at 2:24 pm“You guys wrote the book on worrying about other’s sex habits when you crucified Clinton. Everybody knew Bush Sr. had a mistress and left it alone. Now when we play by your rules you’re unhappy. Should think about all the new rules Bushco has put in place cause they’re really going to bite you guys in the ass after the next election.
Comment by shane — August 28, 2007 @ 1:13 pm”
Hmmm…we conservatives get lambasted every time we bring up Clinton, but you libs can utter his name with impunity? And as far as any rule biting us in the ass…is that going to be when Hillary is prez and things pretty much continue as they are now..except for the additional military action in Iran?
Everyone knows BILL Clinton was impeached for lying to congress, not for fooling around on his wife. And still, if fooling around on his wife didn’t affect Clinton’s leadership, then it shouldn’t affect Craig’s either.
Once again, another’s personal behavior doesn’t matter, unless it can suit someone’s purposes…
August 28th, 2007 at 2:25 pmAlmighty really does not know his history whatsoever. Iberia was indeed a partially colonized province of Rome, but that was prior to a series of invasions by Visigoths and then Vandals in the third through fifth centuries. It is then in the 1100s, I believe, that the Moors invaded and effectively took control of Spain. The “Latin influence” in Spain is not the necessary result of the Roman empire but of the effective expansion of Christianity throughout Spain. Lastly, to call Latins “Aryans” is too dumb to even count as a joke. Spain, like many any Western European cultures, is the end result of the mix of all that came before – that you, Almight, are its end result is nothing but a hilariously ironic coda.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:25 pmWell he is welcome in my party. I’m a liberal , but we are pretty tollerent of this type of thing. You know what, lets change the law and the world so this type of thing is not a problem. My only issue is trolling in public toilets, get a room.
BTW, wouldn’t it be funny if he just changed parties and became a democrat? Issue ends, he is a hero of sorts, and one more on our side of the fence.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:25 pmThe wife nor husband can re-marry because they are bound until one dies.
Comment by DaryllParodyll — August 28, 2007 @ 2:23 pm
so, when a spouse physically or sexually abuses the other, or God forbid, the children, you are saying they are “bound” to each other, and thus can never divorce, per scripture?
August 28th, 2007 at 2:25 pmyou’re funny
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3910b26e685a.htm
For you Hillary whacked Vince/Laura killed her boyfriend
August 28th, 2007 at 2:26 pmI hope Craig doesn’t resign, just like Vitter. It’s going to be funny watching all the protesters walking around in diapers and sitting on johns with “wide stances” in ‘08.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:26 pmLet the Repubs keep their degenerate hypocrites in office. They make a nice anchor that’s going to sink them.
The days of “family values” being associated with the Repub party is officially over.
how easily the left wing ‘tards are fooled by the Liberal and Democratic machine. -Why
Actually, the unelected right wingers have been fooled for some time by the GOP. The list has grown by 7 since Mark Foley, heres two recent additions;
* Republican legislator Ted Klaudt was charged with raping girls under the age of 16.
* Republican city councilman Joseph Monteleone Jr. was found guilty of fondling underage girls.
I also recall that Scanlon and Reed calling the religious right ‘Wackos’. Wake up PIP. Either your a part of the big lie or your fooled.
Comment by Why You So Crazy? — August 28, 2007 @ 2:09 pm
so what you are saying is that no Democrat in the history of the Democratic party has been caught with his pants down doing an underage kid, right?
idiot, the only one fooled is here.
I am nto defending the GOP, I am just laughing at the immense hypocrisy of the left which has advocated for the consensual age for sex to be lowered and then they pretend to go crazy when people they hate carry out actions the left considers normal.
you don’t see it do you, eh? left wing partisan blind fool
August 28th, 2007 at 2:27 pmTP’s Gone Conservo ,
Hey there are plenty Afro-Cubanos aqui en la Florida.
La Musica de usted son uno de lo mejores en el mindo!
Hey do you know Los Munequitos?
August 28th, 2007 at 2:27 pmGreat Cuban group!
God says you can’t marry a divorced woman? Why would god create divorce then? Your saying god didn’t create divorce? Can a divorced man marry again? Is it OK if he marries a divorced woman?
Daryll please enlighten, enquiring minds want to know.
Comment by hellinabucket — August 28, 2007 @ 1:45 pm
MARRIAGE IS HONORABLE IN ALL
Read Genesis 2:21-24
“And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.â€
Matthew 19:6
“Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.â€
Marriage is a distinctly Christian institution, based on God’s Word, which we trust when it says that God created everything, including man, and established marriage for mankind. The marvel of our present society’s wholesale rejection of marriage is no mystery when we consider that our culture has rejected the God who established it.
The fellowship and union of marriage may be the most wonderful relationship God ordained for mankind, short of the indwelling of God’s Spirit in the born-again soul.
Hebrews 13:4
“Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.â€
Marriage is honorable in all! But, Satan and the carnal world system deny this. Beware the worldly philosophies that tell you marriage is a drag, a prison, or slavery. Beware the bitter spirit of the modern feminist movement wherein women adopt a critical and bitter attitude toward men. Beware the spirit of lust whereby men and women want to live playboy lives instead of marrying and establishing a home. All of those spirits are of the devil!
Marriage is honorable in all! It exalts the male-female relationship. Marriage frees their relationship from all guilt, shame, and immorality. The marriage makes the relationship between a man and a woman honorable before God!
It brings honor to each spouse. The world’s lie is that the single, loose-living, party-lifestyle is freedom. How is it freedom for the woman whose man expects her to share his intimacy and support him in life, yet he might move on if he meets someone prettier, friendlier, or more agreeable? Is it freedom for the man whose woman shares his heart, cheers his days, thrills his soul, and yet might be moving on if some other man is more exciting, more handsome, or wealthier? No! Marriage offers faithfulness and permanence in exchange for companionship, love, intimacy, support, and friendship. Marriage is the honorable way to treat each other. Marriage frees from the tyranny of uncertainty. Is it any wonder so many men and women are anxious or hurting considering that they are trapped in the “freedom†of non-commitment?
It brings honor to the children. It models a trusting, faithful relationship that works through its differences, respects each other, and builds each other up. The children learn from both the male and female influences how to treat their future employers, spouse, and their own children.
It brings honor to God. The unselfish Christian marriage in which both parties give 100% to each other models Christ’s love of His saints and their devotion to Him. Since marriage is obedience to God’s commands, it honors God by a submission to His will to conduct properly this relationship.
Though we won’t take the time to examine it, Ephesians 5:21-33 expresses the aim of all Christian marriages, the unity in love, complete devotion, and tender care of each spouse one for the other. The passage teaches the husband and the wife to submit to each other, ensuring the home does not become a dictatorship run by either party. Husbands are called upon to lead the home with the same love for his wife as he has for himself, modeling Christ’s love and intercession for His redeemed ones. Wives are urged to submit themselves devotedly to their husbands, modeling the devoted submission of the believer to His God.
THE ATTACKS ON MARRIAGE
Humanity’s rebellion against Eden’s laws did not end with the Fall into sin. Humanity has been defying God’s other foundational commands for nearly as long.
Contrary to Genesis 1:28, abortion and radical environmentalism rage against specific parts of the foundations God laid for humanity. Adam and Eve themselves broke Genesis 2:16-17, destroying God’s original order and bringing sin upon all of us. Since the Fall, humanity throughout the ages has defied God’s example in Genesis 2:24, “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.â€
Genesis 2:24 explicitly states that a man (singular) and a woman (singular) will separate from family and establish their own home as one co-operating unit (“one fleshâ€). It further states that each couple should marry this way because of (“thereforeâ€) Adam and Eve’s example.
Man responds with polygamy, denying the singular nature of marriage, and with divorce…tearing apart the one flesh. When we consider divorce as a tearing apart of one body, we have a good picture of the emotional, physical, psychological, and spiritual rending of the souls involved.
Man must have very quickly begun divorcing. In Leviticus 21:7&14, 22:13, and Numbers 30:9 we find the first four mentions of divorce. The Hebrew word here means, “to cast out, to drive away, to thrust out.†It implies a violent ejection from the home. It means more than a separation. It means rejection. Apparently, men in their lusts had developed the habit of driving away a wife that did not please them for some reason.
In an age rife with polygamy (Lamech, Esau, Jacob, Gideon, the kings…) why would a man get rid of his wife, when his wicked culture already condones marrying multiple more? Perhaps, he did not want to support her financially. Maybe she angered him in some way. Or, he may have sought to pay lip service to the singular nature of marriage, but wanted to get a different woman for some reason. What wickedness! What selfish lusts! Without the intervention of God, mankind is hopelessly selfish and cruel!
By the time Israel left Egypt they must have been wantonly divorcing their spouses to fulfill their lusts. Undoubtedly, the Israelites had learned from the Egyptians the immoral habit of marrying and divorcing, throwing away the unwanted spouses according to the lusts of their flesh.
God acts to eliminate this unjust throwing out an unwanted wife in Deuteronomy 24:1-4. God gives His Law against divorce.
GOD’S OLD TESTAMENT LAW AGAINST DIVORCE
Deuteronomy 24:1-4
“When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favor in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house. And when she is departed out of his house, she may go and be another man’s wife. And if the latter husband hate her, and write her a bill of divorcement, and giveth it in her hand, and sendeth her out of his house; or if the latter husband die, which took her to be his wife; Her former husband, which sent her away, may not take her again to be his wife, after that she is defiled; for that is abomination before the LORD: and thou shalt not cause the land to sin, which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance.â€
Here, God limits the rejection of a wife. No longer can she and her children be thrown out on a whim. Divorce is now only allowed in one case. The word “divorcement†is a different word than used previously. It simply means “a cutting off.†No longer is violent, lustful ejection of the wife allowed. Only for “uncleanness†can she be cut off, and only then by a due process whereby the man publicly documents his cause, probably before a judge. This ends the marriage. Notice that a woman in OT Israel finds much protection under God’s law, which she did not have under the reign of heathenism. A further protection for her is the right to remarry once put out by her previous husband. The divorce and remarriage are tied together. If it was right for her husband to divorce her, it is right for her to find another husband who will support and love her. If divorced again, she may not return to the first husband, quite possibly to instill the seriousness of divorce.
What could constitute “uncleanness� The word means, “disgraceful behavior, or shameful exposure.†“Uncleanness†definitely refers to sin against God’s laws. The “uncleanness†must not have been adultery, for adulterers were condemned to death by stoning, not divorced and free to remarry. In Ezra 10:10-19 Scripture tells of a mass divorce. The words “put away†tell how devout Israelites divorced their heathen spouses and children in order to be separated as God demanded. Here the “uncleanness†was the heathen nationality of the wives involved.
Does it surprise you that God’s OT law against divorce was so loose? I believe many of us have approached the Bible with a well-intentioned agenda to make it say what we believe, instead of listening to God’s Word speak for itself. Or perhaps it surprises you that God is so narrow? God does not want marriage taken lightly.
The only two other uses of any form of the word “divorce†in the OT occur in the following two verses:
“Thus saith the LORD, Where is the bill of your mother’s divorcement, whom I have put away? or which of my creditors is it to whom I have sold you? Behold, for your iniquities have ye sold yourselves, and for your transgressions is your mother put away†(Isaiah 50:1).
“And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also†(Jeremiah 3:8).
Here, we see that God has just cause to divorce His people from Himself. He justly cuts off the unfaithful nation of Israel. Happily, we read elsewhere that God will restore his OT people to Himself. “For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob†(Romans 11:25-26).
What do we conclude? God hates the practice of unjust divorces, the abusing and tyranny of men (or women) emotionally destroying and breaking up their family, marrying and divorcing at will to fulfill the lusts of their flesh.
“Yet ye say, Wherefore? Because the LORD hath been witness between thee and the wife of thy youth, against whom thou hast dealt treacherously: yet is she thy companion, and the wife of thy covenant. And did not he make one? Yet had he the residue of the spirit. And wherefore one? That he might seek a godly seed. Therefore take heed to your spirit, and let none deal treacherously against the wife of his youth. For the LORD, the God of Israel, saith that he hateth putting away: for one covereth violence with his garment, saith the LORD of hosts: therefore take heed to your spirit, that ye deal not treacherously†(Malachi 2:14-16).
In the Old Testament, God demanded His people not divorce, except in some difficult situations called “uncleanness.â€
GOD’S NEW TESTAMENT LAW AGAINST DIVORCE
It is no surprise that man is wicked and perverse; lying, lusting, and trying to use Scripture to justify his selfishness. By Jesus’ day, some Rabbis interpreted “uncleanness†very conservatively, but others allowed divorce for “every cause†as seen in Matthew 19. (Important point: Beware of following this preacher or that preacher. Rather, listen to God’s Word, being neither looser nor stricter than God is.) The result was undoubtedly a return to the unjust putting away of helpless women and children. We see in Matthew 19:7 that some even treated Deut. 24:1-4 as a command to divorce, rather than a permission that need not necessarily be taken. The fate for the rejected women and children was likely poverty, hardship, and possibly starvation.
Jesus first addresses the subject in Matthew 5:31-32.
“It hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement: But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.â€
Naturally, the religious leaders of Jesus’ day asked Him for His interpretation of Deuteronomy 24:1-4. In Matthew 19:3-12, Jesus speaks to this subject. Notice that He models the correct approach to understanding this subject. He starts in Genesis then refers to Deuteronomy, then makes His own pronouncement. We have tried to follow His example.
Read Matthew 19:3-12
“The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause? And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away? He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so. And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery. His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry. But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given. For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother’s womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.â€
Re-read Matthew 19:9
“And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.â€
Christ gives his own law regarding marriage, which is much narrower than the Old Testament law. Christ expects a marriage to be “until death†unless one of the spouses is sexually unfaithful. The Greek word translated “fornication†(porneia) often means premarital immorality (1 Cor. 7:2); also in 1 Corinthians 5:1 it refers to a case of adultery. We would do well to understand it to mean any sexual unfaithfulness including bestiality, homosexuality, and child molestation. [Strong defines the Greek word “porneia†as “harlotry (including adultery and incest).†Webster’s 1828 dictionary defines “fornication†as “the incontinence or lewdness of unmarried persons, male or female; also, the criminal conversation of a married man with an unmarried woman.â€]
To emphasize His narrowness, the other two accounts of Christ’s speech in Mark 10:1-12 and Luke 16:16 do not include this exception. Literally, Christ forbade all divorce/remarriage and all marrying of divorced people, except when a spouse is unfaithful. In that emotionally heart-rending, trust-destroying situation, Christ allowed the grieved spouse to walk away from the marriage without blame, free to remarry and put his or her life back together. Remember that remarriage is inherent in the Old Testament permission to divorce in Deuteronomy 24:1-4, which Christ here replaces. Notice how Christ ties together the divorce and remarriage with the word “and†when He says, “Whosoever shall put away his wife, excepting for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery.†Here Christ ties the divorce and remarriage together.
The disciples are shocked by the narrowness of Jesus’ pronouncement. Good people today might stagger at Christ’s narrowness and argue that divorce is justified in cases of spousal abuse, abandonment, financial irresponsibility, or unforeseen circumstances such as health issues like infertility (a discussion of what should be done in such devastating cases is beyond the scope of this lesson). Here, the disciples question the value of risking marriage, fearing they might be permanently saddled with a “lemon.†Christ replies by warning them that single-hood is only for a few who can accept such a lifestyle (Matthew 19:11-12).
Let us summarize Christ’s teaching on divorce/remarriage. Our Lord forbade all divorce/remarriage except for the cause of an unfaithful spouse. In the case of unfaithfulness, the innocent partner can seek to be freed from such a hurtful yoke and remarry. Such an innocent party is not an adulterer in exercising this permission. However, if a couple divorces for any other cause, they commit adultery in the divorce and remarriage. Sound Bible expositors such as Matthew Henry, H A Ironside, D Martyn Lloyd-Jones, Matthew Poole, John R. Rice, John Walvoord, and David Cloud agree that Christ forbids all divorce except for spousal unfaithfulness.
However, some argue that Christ was not narrow enough. One common attempt to negate Christ’s exception is to argue that Christ was illuminating the Law instead of speaking principles for the age of Grace. I must say that I strongly sympathize with the desire to oppose the huge tide of unjust divorces in our day, but we must not go beyond the Scriptures. Christ Himself said that the preaching of the Kingdom began with John the Baptist two verses before addressing divorce in Luke 16:18. In Matthew 16-18, the three chapters leading immediately into our text in chapter 19, Jesus teaches His disciples the foundational principles of His church. He founded the church age in Matthew 16. There is every exegetical reason to believe His instructions in chapter 19 apply to His churches. Interestingly, H. A. Ironside addresses this objection, pointing out the incorrectness of it.
We find the next major text on divorce/remarriage in I Corinthians 7.
Read 1 Corinthians 7:10-16
“And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart from her husband: But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried, or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife. But to the rest speak I, not the Lord: If any brother hath a wife that believeth not, and she be pleased to dwell with him, let him not put her away. And the woman which hath an husband that believeth not, and if he be pleased to dwell with her, let her not leave him. For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband: else were your children unclean; but now are they holy. But if the unbelieving depart, let him depart. A brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases: but God hath called us to peace. For what knowest thou, O wife, whether thou shalt save thy husband? or how knowest thou, O man, whether thou shalt save thy wife?â€
What does the phrase, “yet not I, but the Lord†mean? Paul is pointing out that he is referring to what Christ said while on Earth. On the other hand, in verse 12 we read, “But to the rest speak I, not the Lord.†Paul points out that he is now going to add to what Christ said. Paul is simply fulfilling John 16:12-13 where Christ pre-authenticated the New Testament epistles. Some misunderstand Paul’s second remark to mean that Paul is denying God’s authority and inspiration on his statements. However, that is not Paul’s point at all. He is simply showing when he is referring to Christ’s command and when he is adding to it by the Holy Spirit. 2 Timothy 3:16 assures us that “all Scripture is given by inspiration of God†and we need not worry about how to weed through it to pick out the uninspired parts.
Notice that Paul does not repeat Christ’s exception. Is Paul now contradicting Christ? We must understand this verse in light of what Christ already said. The repetition of part of a statement cannot be taken to negate the rest of the statement, unless explicitly so stated. (If Richard says, “I really enjoyed the pizza and Coke,†and I quote him to someone else as saying “Richard says he enjoyed the pizza,†I do not mean to deny his enjoyment of the Coke. I am selecting what is appropriate to my audience.)
Paul here quotes part of the command to affirm the permanency of marriage, not to contradict what Christ has already said. Obviously, the God who gave both passages is not contradicting Himself. If He intended to disallow the exception, He would have explicitly stated so, just as Christ pointedly replaced the OT law of divorce with His own.
In 1 Corinthians 7:12-14, 16, the Holy Spirit teaches Paul how to deal with the situation of a believer married to a lost person. The believer must not initiate divorce, but work to win the unbeliever and use the sanctifying influence of the indwelling Spirit to bring light to the home.
According to 1 Corinthians 7:15, the believer may not divorce the unbelieving spouse. If the unbeliever abandons the spouse, the believer is to let them go and is not under obligation to stop the unbeliever. Instead, the believer is to be peaceable toward the unbeliever, as verse 16 goes on to show, hoping to win them to Christ.
Some assert that “not under bondage†means, “free to remarry.†If that was meant, we could ask why God did not speak more plainly. Consider that if the departing spouse is sexually active with someone else, the exception of Matthew 19:9 gives the believer freedom to remarry. Otherwise, the context of the verse is about not divorcing and about displaying Christ to try to win the spouse. Albert Barnes states that this phrase simply absolves the believer from having to help the abandoning spouse in the future. Jamison, Faussett, and Brown persuasively show that the phrase means the believer is not bound to try to save the marriage or resist the departure. Matthew Henry and Matthew Poole, nearly 400 years ago, saw the freedom from “bondage†as release from the marriage bond.
What do we conclude about “not under bondage� Do we pick our favorite scholar’s viewpoint? Rather, let us examine the immediate context, which is about NOT divorcing. The thrust of the passage is to reach the unbelieving spouse for Christ. To here read a second exception to the divorce rule would seem to be taking liberty with Christ’s Words, which the Apostle is here explaining. The safest interpretation is to be no narrower, or broader, than Christ is. Further, to see “abandonment by the unbelieving spouse†as grounds for divorce puts us in the situation of trying to determine whether the departing spouse is born-again.
Therefore, we conclude that marriage is a sacred God-given institution. God expects marriage to be a permanent arrangement, but provides an exception. If one spouse is sexually unfaithful, the injured party has God’s permission to divorce/remarry.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:27 pmWell, daryll just published the Bible on TP.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:29 pmTherefore we conclude that daryll is capable of using both Ctl+C and Ctl+V whilst failiing to convince anyone he’s still sane.
I’m Spaniard/Dominican/Italian/Puerto-Rican with Cuban and Colombian relatives. Soy Latino 100% Demonio Anglo!
…what you are saying is your a human being/ Guess what, we all are, its time to get over the past and repeating past bias’s. Its mankinds major fault and why he still, to this day, repeats history.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:30 pmThe wife nor husband can re-marry because they are bound until one dies.
Comment by DaryllParodyll — August 28, 2007 @ 2:23 pm
so, when a spouse physically or sexually abuses the other, or God forbid, the children, you are saying they are “bound†to each other, and thus can never divorce, per scripture?
you’re funny
Comment by DRxJ — August 28, 2007 @ 2:25 pm
The spouse can separate from the wife/husband, but cannot file for divorce until the wife/husband is caught committing adultery. Even then, the ex- husband/wife cannot seek re-marriage until her spouse is deceased.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:30 pm“Iberia was indeed a partially colonized province of Rome, but that was prior to a series of invasions by Visigoths and then Vandals in the third through fifth centuries. ”
Wrong!
Spain after Italy was the moist Roman province and was considered a core province of the Empire.
Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninous Pious and Macus Aurealious were Spaniards.
The Visigoths were originally Germans but by the time were settle in Spain by the treaty of 415 they were Romanized after having living in the Empire for 3 generations.
They drove the Vandals out of spain and ruled the Peninsuala in the name of The Empire 1st the West and then the Eastern Empire.
The Islamic Invasion occured in 711 however the Romans, Goths and Celts resisted in the North.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:32 pmCastillians are of Italian Orifgin, Catalans and Aragonese are of Gothic origin and Gallego are Celts.
However all are Latin by culture and language.
Daryll this isnt sunday school and nobody is gonna read that long of a post. Thats YOUR ideology and thats why we have laws and Democracy not a theocracy.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:32 pmActually, O.Bigfoot, you got the facts wrong, of course. Clinton was impeached for lying under oath during a deposition, not for lying to Congress. Man, trolls have a knee-jerk need to prove their ignorance over and over again.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:32 pmThere was also more then one Hapsburg Empire. Look up the information, it is available.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:32 pmis there any Leviticus verses your Cult also interprets, daryllparodyll?
August 28th, 2007 at 2:32 pmthat shellfish thing has always confused me.
as well as the woman being unclean during menstration.
Divorce was not created by God, but if a spouse is caught committing adultery then the husband/wife can divorce that person. The wife nor husband can re-marry because they are bound until one dies.
Or, if your new bride doesn’t bleed on her wedding night, Deuteronomy says you’re supposed to take her to the door of her father’s house and bash her head in with a rock.
Ah, traditional values!
August 28th, 2007 at 2:34 pm.
idiot, the only one fooled is here. -Why
Yes I know you are here.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:34 pmbig papa,
The Spanish Visigoths preserved the Roman Civilization of Spain.
They maintained Cities, Roads, acueducts and Libraries.
The Islamic invaders copied our books and our civilization.
As an Anglo you know nothing about my people’s history.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:36 pmYou proved my point about the Left’s racism towards Hispanics.
After all Us Hispoanuics couldn’t have devolped civilization on our own!
Typical Leftard revisionist history!
As always Muslims=Good
Latins=Bad!
And that is my point, Almighty, you were incorrect to just point to the Roman empire and say that is why Spaniards are Latin. The influences were too varied to just look at one factor. historically I was accurate, yes Iberia was an important province, but it was “partially” colonized. Visigoths were not “German,” as they term “German” did not arise until Roman historians conflated the “barbaric” tribes under the label German. To this day, one can use the term “germanic tribes,” but it is not accurate. Visigoths, for example, spent about zero time in Germany proper. Having said that, you knowledge of Spain’s history belies your beligerence – I just don’t get your Angry Latin bit, what’s up with that?
August 28th, 2007 at 2:37 pmI’m Spaniard/Dominican/Italian/Puerto-Rican with Cuban and Colombian relatives. Soy Latino 100% Demonio Anglo!
…what you are saying is your a human being/ Guess what, we all are, its time to get over the past and repeating past bias’s. Its mankinds major fault and why he still, to this day, repeats history.
Comment by Why You So Crazy? — August 28, 2007 @ 2:30 pm
It time to get over the past? Is this what you tell the Jesse Jackson faction of the Democratic party?
In fact, the Democratic party seems to always remind us what a bunch of racist live in the USA and how slavery screwed up the black psyche.
I agree it is time to get over the past, but if I were you, I would make sure that your party gets over it first, don’t you think, my poor foooled partisan hack?
August 28th, 2007 at 2:38 pmKrazny,
August 28th, 2007 at 2:39 pmYes, there were actually 3!~
The 1st being the United Hapsburg Empire under Charles V of Austria or Carlos I as we call him.
The he split his Empire up with the Spanish Hapsburgs staring with Felip II getting Spain, Italy, Low Countries, Franche Comte and Latin America.
Then there was the Austrian Hapsburgs who were given Austria, Bohemia and Hungary.
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nations
So your opinions on America today, are based on a ancient empire?
What good does that do?
August 28th, 2007 at 2:40 pmDaryll this isnt sunday school and nobody is gonna read that long of a post. Thats YOUR ideology and thats why we have laws and Democracy not a theocracy.
Comment by Why You So Crazy? — August 28, 2007 @ 2:32 pm
God’s laws shouldn’t be considered as theory. These are facts.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:41 pmWillyK,
August 28th, 2007 at 2:42 pmSpani wasn’t partially Latinized.
As a Roman Province spain after Italy was the most Roman province.
Every Spaniard spoke Latin or a Dialect.
The Visigoths were Latin Speaking when they arrived in Spain and considered themselves Spaniards after a generation.
God’s laws shouldn’t be considered as theory. These are facts.
Comment by DaryllParodyll — August 28, 2007 @ 2:41 pm
Dammit. And I so wanted to eat shrimp tonight for dinner.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:42 pmWell, at least I get to stone my wife and daughter, and still get in to heaven.
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
O.K.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:43 pmSo another outspokenly homophobic politician gets busted for trying to do a job in a john.
He did not get the job done and now he may lose his job.
Why does God hate republicans?
It time to get over the past? Is this what you tell the Jesse Jackson faction of the Democratic party?
Matter of fact I do. I nor my family never owned any slaves. Youcan’t blame me for other peoples actions, nor for Roman empires, nor for what Hitler did to the Jewish.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:43 pmDaryll this isnt sunday school and nobody is gonna read that long of a post. Thats YOUR ideology and thats why we have laws and Democracy not a theocracy.
Comment by Why You So Crazy? — August 28, 2007 @ 2:32 pm
while it is true that our governemnt is not a theocracy, our laws, the Constitution, etc, etc are based on Judeo-Christian values and traditions.
I know that Liberals hate this tiny little fact of history, but it is true.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:43 pmSo your opinions on America today, are based on a ancient empire?
No it’s based on Racist Leftists who belive that my people are helpless victims that we need their aide.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:44 pmThey then hate people like me and Why that that don’t view ourselves as victims and knows trhe truth about our origins
God’s laws shouldn’t be considered as theory. These are facts.
OK. If your wife didn’t bleed on your wedding night, then it’s time to bash her face in with a rock. That’s what your God requires.
I’ve got a rock handy.
… well did she or didn’t she?
August 28th, 2007 at 2:44 pm.
God’s laws shouldn’t be considered as theory. These are facts.
Comment by DaryllParodyll — August 28, 2007 @ 2:41 pm
Dammit. And I so wanted to eat shrimp tonight for dinner.
Well, at least I get to stone my wife and daughter, and still get in to heaven.
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
Comment by DRxJ — August 28, 2007 @ 2:42 pm
Wrong, do you remember “Thou shalt not kill”? Also, the New Testament is consisted of Laws for the Gentiles (you and me). The Old Testament should be utilized as a tool to assist you in life.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:44 pmhomophobic politician gets busted for trying to do a job in a john.
He did not get the job done
Comment by slaybaugh — August 28, 2007 @ 2:43 pm
True. There’s nothing more “coitus interuptus” than hearing the words
August 28th, 2007 at 2:45 pm“Sir, you’re under arrest”!!!
Right, daryll?
Talk about a mood killer
Geez
God’s laws shouldn’t be considered as theory. These are facts.
Comment by Daryll
You should consider moving back to Europe then. Start another inquisition.
America is secular, the meliting pot of the world, and to be secular we create laws that all abide by no matter if your Jewish. Catholic, Christian, Mormon etc etc.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:46 pmDRxJ,
August 28th, 2007 at 2:46 pmYou’re a rcaist loser.
Your opinion has no validity as you have a problem with Latins who don’t bow down to your Leftist KKKult!
our laws, the Constitution, etc, etc are based on Judeo-Christian values and traditions.
I know that Liberals hate this tiny little fact of history, but it is true.
That would certainly explain why the first commandment and the first amendment directly contradict each other.
Moron.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:46 pm.
daryll, what is wrong with you?
I didn’t say stone my wife and daughter to death.
Geez.
Maybe just a little concussion or two during their menstration, is all.
Tools for life, ya know.
You’re funny
August 28th, 2007 at 2:47 pmNo it’s based on Racist Leftists who belive that my people are helpless victims that we need their aide.
No, thats what YOU think. I am saying GET OVER IT!!
DAYUM!
August 28th, 2007 at 2:47 pmWrong!
Spain after Italy was the moist Roman province and was considered a core province of the Empire.
Nothing like a moist province for dessert!
August 28th, 2007 at 2:48 pmConsidering the republicans like Tancredo generally want to make it very illegal for hispanics to even be in the US, and stomp out any cultural references, I am unsure how leftists are so racist. But if that is what you want to believe go for it.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:49 pmIt time to get over the past? Is this what you tell the Jesse Jackson faction of the Democratic party?
Matter of fact I do. I nor my family never owned any slaves. Youcan’t blame me for other peoples actions, nor for Roman empires, nor for what Hitler did to the Jewish.
Comment by Why You So Crazy? — August 28, 2007 @ 2:43 pm
Well, tell that to the Democratic politicians who are pushing for black reperations, who claim that racism in the USA is as bad today as it was during the Civil War.
Force the Democratic party to cut-off the Jesse Jackson faction of your party. Demand that your party shuts-up fools like Al Sharpton. Because Democratic actions speak completly against what you are saying.
let us not forget that Michael Steele was thrown Oreo cookies (black on the outside, white in the inside) by Democrats while he gave speeches…why? because he is a Conservative minority.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:49 pmResource for dealing with ignorant theocrats who think the US should be more like Iran.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:49 pm.
DRxJ,
You’re a rcaist loser.
Your opinion has no validity as you have a problem with Latins who don’t bow down to your Leftist KKKult!
Comment by Joker Blows Almighty Latin Kings Nations, why? — August 28, 2007 @ 2:46 pm
Still haven’t found any proof that I’ve ever posted a racist statement, have you, little one.
It’s okay, I understand your frustration. It’s kinda like comparing that to WMD.
THEY FRIGGIN’ DON’T EXIST, AND NEITHER DO ANY RACIST STATEMENTS BY ME.
Thanks for playing tho.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:50 pmYou’re funny
our laws, the Constitution, etc, etc are based on Judeo-Christian values and traditions.
I know that Liberals hate this tiny little fact of history, but it is true.
That would certainly explain why the first commandment and the first amendment directly contradict each other.
Moron.
.
Comment by Grand Moff Texan — August 28, 2007 @ 2:46 pm
actually, THEY DON’T!!!!
Love God above all things?
how the hell does this contradict the 1st amendment….Freedom of speech, press and says that Congress shall make no laws forcing any religion on anyone
wow!!!
In fact, the 1st amendment complements the 1st Commandment. it allows people to practice their Faith as they wish.
but since you brough it up, do tell how the rest of the Commandments are contradicted by our laws?
wow, LIberals, such poor, pathetic creatures.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:50 pmWow, I go away for a bit and Daryll drops half of the new testament in cut and paste fashion.
Can’t just post a link huh Daryll? I apologize to the thinking members of this thread for unleashing the beast that is Daryll.
In the future, my questions to Daryll will be rhetorical. And cynical.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:50 pmlet us not forget that Michael Steele was thrown Oreo cookies (black on the outside, white in the inside) by Democrats while he gave speeches…
No, he wasn’t.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:51 pm.
Krazny,
August 28th, 2007 at 2:51 pmTancredo is a race traitor.
He’s Latin but because of the Left’s brainwashing of Italians in America he doesn’t know it!
Look at him he ain’t that white!
Spain after Italy was the moist Roman province and was considered a core province of the Empire.
Nothing like a moist province for dessert!
Comment by RUCerious — August 28, 2007 @ 2:48 pm
Why do I have the distinct feeling that Joker has never even experienced something warm, moist, and enjoyable.
Just sayin…
August 28th, 2007 at 2:52 pmDRxJ ,
August 28th, 2007 at 2:52 pmYou are racist.
You said Colubus was Aryan.
He was Italo-Latin!
Resource for dealing with ignorant theocrats who think the US should be more like Iran.
.
Comment by Grand Moff Texan — August 28, 2007 @ 2:49 pm
and this is what is wrong with left wing lunatics today. They believe anything and everything they read on a website. hahaha!!!
Sorry, no one is calling for the USA to be like Iran. I would want a minister, priest, rabbi, etc to be forcing their religion on me. But at the same time, I don’t want atheist telling me that I can’t practice my religion.
sorry kid, you are quite wrong. But I don’t expect you to see it, you are one poor blind partisan hack.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:52 pmThe Islamic Invasion occured in 711 however the Romans, Goths and Celts resisted in the North.
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nations #218
…and LOST…
August 28th, 2007 at 2:53 pmIn fact, the 1st amendment complements the 1st Commandment. it allows people to practice their Faith as they wish.
Unless you can read. The injunction to have no other God directly contradicts the establishment clause.
Now you know.
It’s ok: keep going. You’re bound to be right about something eventually, just by sheer dumb luck.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:53 pm.
Why do I have the distinct feeling that Joker has never even experienced something warm, moist, and enjoyable.
Ha,
August 28th, 2007 at 2:53 pmI’m dating 3 women right now!
I’ve slept with more women than you ever will!
No it’s based on Racist Leftists who belive that my people are helpless victims that we need their aide. -ALKN
Why would a racist feel SORRY for your people? Thats the most Orwellian statement I have heard in a while. Your the one whos a member of an Ethnic group, I am member of NO groups.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:54 pmlet us not forget that Michael Steele was thrown Oreo cookies (black on the outside, white in the inside) by Democrats while he gave speeches…
No, he wasn’t.
.
Comment by Grand Moff Texan — August 28, 2007 @ 2:51 pm
Oh, I am sorry, the Oreo’s never hit him. They just threw it at him.
idiot.
stop with your crazed out left wing propaganda. Amazing how left wing ‘tards beleive anythign and everything they read on the web.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:54 pmYou said Colubus was Aryan.
He was Italo-Latin!
Comment by Almighty Joker Fellates Latin Kings in Public Restrooms — August 28, 2007 @ 2:52
thank you again for your admitted defeat. Not having any proof, as usual.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:55 pmYou can now leave, again
You get that folks? You are racist because you are compassionate?
Why then King, Compassionate conservatism is racist by your Orwellian twistery.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:55 pmbig papa
Wrong, we won!
August 28th, 2007 at 2:56 pmWe drove out the invaders after 700 years.
The Tide turned in 1085 when we liberated the capital Toledo,
Then in 1215 we crushed the Almohodovids at Navas de Tolosas.
Finally we took Granada in 1492.
We also expelled removed traces of the occupation.
We won and your Islamic allies lost.
That’s why racist Leftists like you hate Latins.
We defeated your allies!
As an Anglo you know nothing about my people’s history.
You proved my point about the Left’s racism towards Hispanics.
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nations #225
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!
…I’m a MOOR you idiot!
…AND…
…it’s YOU who are a product of “revisionism”/racism…
August 28th, 2007 at 2:56 pmBut I don’t expect you to see it, you are one poor blind partisan hack.
No, I’m just not ignorant enough to think that the US was founded on the “Judeo-Christian values” so many of the framers spent so much time mocking.
You don’t have to read it on a website. Hell, I learned the real history of my country years before anybody said “www,” and certainly before a group of well-funded theocrats started pushing their historical revisionism.
The atheist Karl Rove is laughing at these useful idiots.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:56 pm.
I’m dating 3 women right now!
I’ve slept with more women than you ever will!
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nation
Oh man dont get Daryll started again.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:57 pmComment by Almighty Latin Kings Nations #225
…read up on the Almoravids, Almohades, and Ummayad dynasties…
August 28th, 2007 at 2:57 pmidiot.
stop with your crazed out left wing propaganda. Amazing how left wing ‘tards beleive anythign and everything they read on the web.
Comment by why — August 28, 2007 @ 2:54 pm
errrrr, huh? I just read about crazed left wing ‘tards believing anything
they read on the web.
so is it true?
August 28th, 2007 at 2:57 pmDRxJ,
August 28th, 2007 at 2:57 pmYou are racist!
Why do Leftists like you go after Gonzales?
If he was Jewish or Muslim you wouldn’t have.
It’s because he’s a Hispanic that doesn’t belived in DemocratiKKK brainwashing!
It’s it the way,,the homophobic repubs are always the ones getting caught being just what their so afraid of. Amazing. He’ll resign soon opening up another seat for a democrat to try an grab. And gee isn’t Ari making the rounds these days. Still great with the lies from having to answer for Bush’’s lies. Must have run out of money from that book that went right to the bargain bin.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:58 pmIn fact, the 1st amendment complements the 1st Commandment. it allows people to practice their Faith as they wish.
Unless you can read. The injunction to have no other God directly contradicts the establishment clause.
Now you know.
It’s ok: keep going. You’re bound to be right about something eventually, just by sheer dumb luck.
.
Comment by Grand Moff Texan — August 28, 2007 @ 2:53 pm
hmmmm……wrong.
1) The Establishment clause has been interpreted by Liberals to mean what they want.
2) To love God above all things and that thou shall have no other Gods doesn’t go against the Establishment clause.
3) You only follow the 10 Commandments if you are Jewish, Christian or Muslim. If you are not, guess what, the 10 Commandments don’t apply to you.
4) Now, let me repeat what I said, our government, our laws are based on Judeo-Christian morals and values. Does this mean that it is every single Christian, Jewish law, moral, etc? of course not.
5) I don’t expect narrow minded, hate religion Liberals to know this, or understant this.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:58 pmOh, I am sorry, the Oreo’s never hit him. They just threw it at him.
idiot.
Let me know when he can keep his story straight.
August 28th, 2007 at 2:58 pm.
Big Papa,
read up on the Almoravids, Almohades, and Ummayad dynasties…
We defeated them and drove the out of our land.
Look I understand that as a Leftist you support the Jihad.
But we won!
That’s why Spain is free and we preserved our Roman heritage!
Too Bad
August 28th, 2007 at 2:59 pmYou Islamo-Stalinist!
You allies lost!
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
We won and your Islamic allies lost. -ALKN
Islamic allies? The only persons I’ve seen holding hands with them are in the oil industry Man are you confused.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:00 pmAmazing how left wing ‘tards beleive anythign and everything they read on the web.
Comment by why does Joker fellate Aryan Kings? — August 28, 2007 @ 2:54 pm
Amazing how one who constantly critiques a groups educational skills, can’t spell.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:00 pmFu*k it…
…the (deluded, self-proclaimed) Latin Kings Nation…
…es muy mas macho…
…feel better?
…’cuz it doesn’t change history ONE freakin’ bit!
August 28th, 2007 at 3:00 pmDRxJ,
You are racist!
Why do Leftists like you go after Gonzales?
If he was Jewish or Muslim you wouldn’t have.
It’s because he’s a Hispanic that doesn’t belived in DemocratiKKK brainwashing!
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nations — August 28, 2007 @ 2:57 pm
It wasn’t because he was hispanic, it was because he is an incompetent idiot. Same reason I go after Bush.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:01 pmTo love God above all things and that thou shall have no other Gods doesn’t go against the Establishment clause.
Wow, some jokes really do just write themselves.
Just because I won’t let a bunch of posturing hypocrites hijack my country an make up a comically stupid history (which doesn’t even recognize the process of confessionalization that they themselves cite) doesn’t mean I hate religion.
I’m just not stupid enough to fall for it.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:01 pm.
You’re a MOOR?
Are you from Moroco or Algeria?
If so too bad!
We won you lost!
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
Yeah I hate your Muslim kind.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:01 pmMuhamed was a pedophile!
go to your varpet and worship your Moon God loser!
The atheist Karl Rove is laughing at these useful idiots.
.
Comment by Grand Moff Texan — August 28, 2007 @ 2:56 pm
So, you do base your believes on hearsay, right? and on what the left wing propaganda tells you to believe. Since Karl Rove told Chris Wallace that his was a practicing Episcopelian, but it was rumors and Liberal newspapers, who never interview Karl Rove who claimed he was an atheist.
Ah, thank you my ignorant Liberal. You just proved my point.
You believe the things that fit into your wacked out crazy world. And if they don’t fit, you label them as not true.
Son, child, little one, why do you believe the Liberal sources who never interviewed Karl Rove personally when they claim that he is an atheist. But you don’t believe Karl Rove who said he is a religious Episcopelian and whos personal IRS records show that biggest charity contribution he makes every year goes to the Episcopelian church he attends?
poor Liberals, poor retarded Liberals.
sorry son, deny it all you want, but our culture, our laws are based on Judeo-Christian values. Just because you don’t want to believe it, it doesn’t make it so.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:02 pmDRxJ,
August 28th, 2007 at 3:02 pmYou keep posting racist junk
Aryan Kings?
Explain who now Latin Kings are Aryan?
Oh that’s right us Hispanics are not allowed to know our History and have different opinions than you CraKKKers!
Yeah I hate your Muslim kind.
Muhamed was a pedophile!
go to your varpet and worship your Moon God loser!
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nations — August 28, 2007 @ 3:01 pm
there’s the love… i knew it was deep down in there somewhere.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:03 pmkeep fighting the good fight.
Why do Leftists like you go after Gonzales?
Not because of his skin color, but because hes a hypocrite and a lies, just like Sen. Craig.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:03 pmTo love God above all things and that thou shall have no other Gods doesn’t go against the Establishment clause.
Wow, some jokes really do just write themselves.
Just because I won’t let a bunch of posturing hypocrites hijack my country an make up a comically stupid history (which doesn’t even recognize the process of confessionalization that they themselves cite) doesn’t mean I hate religion.
I’m just not stupid enough to fall for it.
.
Comment by Grand Moff Texan — August 28, 2007 @ 3:01 pm
Oh, so you according to you, religious people are stupid.
Nice to know that you consider religious people to be less human than you and beneath you.
Wow, ,who spoke like this, oh that is right, Mao Tsung, Stalin, Hitler, and all the other horrific dictators of the 20th century.
man you Liberals love to discriminate.
Keep on talking an dkeep putting your foot in your mouth, moron.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:04 pmOh that’s right us Hispanics are not allowed to know our History and have different opinions than you CraKKKers!
Comment by Almight Latiny Kings fellate Joker’s Nations — August 28, 2007 @ 3:02 pm
August 28th, 2007 at 3:04 pmBig Papa,
August 28th, 2007 at 3:04 pmI would’ve loved to been at Navas de Tolosa and see Muslim blood on the ground.
How about in Sevilla Y Cordoba when we made your Mosques our Church!
ha ha ha ha ha!
Moorish loser!
“Well, tell that to the Democratic politicians who are pushing for black reperations, who claim that racism in the USA is as bad today as it was during the Civil War.”
Name one and we’ll talk, after you tell your republican pols to stop bailing out the weathly when they make bad investments (see the current mortage problem for instance, or the bail outs for hedge funds) while ignoring the common man, on both sides of the aisle.
“Force the Democratic party to cut-off the Jesse Jackson faction of your party. Demand that your party shuts-up fools like Al Sharpton. Because Democratic actions speak completly against what you are saying.”
What has Jessie said or done that is worse than lying our country into a war?
“let us not forget that Michael Steele was thrown Oreo cookies (black on th outside, white in the inside) by Democrats while he gave speeches…why? because he is a Conservative minority.”
This never happened. it has been debunked
http://www.americablog.com/2005/11/gov-ehrlich-and-lt-gov-steele-in.html
But that won’t stop fools from believing it, after all you believe bush is a good president…
August 28th, 2007 at 3:05 pmYeah I hate your Muslim kind.
Muhamed was a pedophile!
go to your varpet and worship your Moon God loser!
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nations — August 28, 2007 @ 3:01 pm
there’s the love… i knew it was deep down in there somewhere.
keep fighting the good fight.
Comment by alp3 — August 28, 2007 @ 3:03 pm
Shoot, replace Almighty Latin Kings Nations “Muslim” with “Christian” and he sounds just like a Liberal Christian hater.
Most liberals are Christianphobes.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:05 pmummm, Hitler was Christian, why ask why (drink bud dry)
Just a little information as I’m sure you’re still trying to find one iota of information that was a racist post by me.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:05 pmwhy is an a$$hole. plain and simple. and angry one as well. One could say why is a flaming a$$hole considering the subject matter of this thread. Something that why wondered from ages ago.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:05 pmHey Almighty Latin Kings Nations
what does the tattoo on your left arm look like, and what does it symbolize?
August 28th, 2007 at 3:06 pmYeah I hate your Muslim kind.
Muhamed was a pedophile!
I dont care for extremists radicals in any color or religion. And for the Record Muslims see Jesus as alive in heaven, who will come back to fight the anti-christ, just like the evangelicals do.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:07 pmDRxJ,
August 28th, 2007 at 3:07 pmHey so it bothers you that there are Latins that don’t accept 2nd class ataus you Leftist KKKLans offer.
I know it’s tough seeing a Spanish person not needing your assistance right?
#
Oh that’s right us Hispanics are not allowed to know our History and have different opinions than you CraKKKers!
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nations — August 28, 2007 @ 3:02 pm
Love, sure enough. keebler crakkkers?
What do you have against elves?
their magic powers?
August 28th, 2007 at 3:07 pmSo, you do base your believes on hearsay, right?
No. Karl Rove has told many of his close associates over the years that he’s not a Christian. He’s had a long time to correct the record. He didn’t. Now that Rove is looking for a job, he’s pretending to be a Christian and he’s hoping that no one read David Kuo’s book.
What, he went on FOX? Wow, great source, dude. They have the most ignorant viewers in the news business, which explains you.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:07 pm.
I know it’s tough seeing a Spanish person not needing your assistance right?
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nations — August 28, 2007 @ 3:07 pm
….still waiting
August 28th, 2007 at 3:08 pmyou’re funny, though
bobwurst,
August 28th, 2007 at 3:08 pmLike you would know right!
Not all of us have a Tat on the Left you loser.
You know nothing!
But that won’t stop fools from believing it, after all you believe bush is a good president…
Comment by bobwurst — August 28, 2007 @ 3:05 pm
More like they believe Bush is a god, much the way they worshiped Reagan.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:08 pmOh, so you according to you, religious people are stupid.
No. I mentioned the “comically stupid history” that I’m not stupid enough to fall for.
You are becoming easier and easier to explain.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:09 pm.
But that won’t stop fools from believing it, after all you believe bush is a good president…
Comment by bobwurst — August 28, 2007 @ 3:05 pm
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Classic Liberal stupidity.
Fact, after fact, after fact proves you Liberals wrong about President Bush and the Republicans and Conservatives. But do you stop believing all the conspiracy theories that are out there? Of course not!
shut up already with your, “But that won’t stop fools from believing it….” you Libtards and Dumbcrats will believe anything that is anti-Bush, anti-Amrican, anti-Conservative, anti-Christian.
Thanks for giving me the chance to laugh at your immense stupidity and hypocrisy.
oh wait, since you read it on a website, it must be true…..poor, brainwashed, toolish left wingers. The left loves puppets like you.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:10 pmFact, after fact, after fact proves you Liberals wrong about President Bush and the Republicans and Conservatives.
Right, just look at all Bush’s success.
I’m sure there’s something around here … somewhere …
August 28th, 2007 at 3:12 pm.
But that won’t stop fools from believing it, after all you believe bush is a good president…
Comment by bobwurst — August 28, 2007 @ 3:05 pm
More like they believe Bush is a god, much the way they worshiped Reagan.
Comment by Krazny — August 28, 2007 @ 3:08 pm
Ah, there you go again Liberals, projecting on to us your behavior.
Sorry kids, we odn’t worship our politicians like you worship Bill Clinton, or Al Gore, Murtha, John Kerry, Stalin, Mao Tsung (let us not forget that Liberals in the 1960s carried his little red book everywhere) etc, etc, etc. (you know the one using Global Warming fear monguering…oh sorry, Liberals are allowed to use fear to get people to side with them, and Republicans are not).
August 28th, 2007 at 3:12 pmRead your reply and deny that you are what you say.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:12 pmoh wait, since you read it on a website, it must be true…..poor, brainwashed, toolish left wingers. The left loves puppets like you.
Comment by why — August 28, 2007 @ 3:10 pm
so am i poor, brainwashed, toolish left winger?
I just read it on a website…
what,why?
August 28th, 2007 at 3:12 pmFact, after fact, after fact proves you Liberals wrong about President Bush and the Republicans and Conservatives.
Right, just look at all Bush’s success.
I’m sure there’s something around here … somewhere …
.
Comment by Grand Moff Texan — August 28, 2007 @ 3:12 pm
Well, stupid Liberals usually can’t find things that are right infront of them. Don’t worry, most Liberals are like you, silly little people who are easily brainwashed.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:13 pmwhy,
Let’s not forget Latins that din’t tow the DemoKKKrat’s line are allowed to be attacked racially.
Since we’re not their serfs we are fair game.
The Left is the real racists of taoday.
A combination of the KKK and Stalin they are ignorant, racist and hostile to differing opinion.
They hate self thinking Latins but support Islamo-Fascists!
August 28th, 2007 at 3:13 pmStrange logic!
As usual, “why” has got nothing.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:14 pm.
Why, do you stand behind this president?
Do you believe he is a man of his word?
August 28th, 2007 at 3:14 pmAs usual, “why†has got nothing.
.
Comment by Grand Moff Texan — August 28, 2007 @ 3:14 pm
Anyone with an IQ over 100 knows I got more than any Liberal.
But you won’t know this, right? :)
August 28th, 2007 at 3:15 pmI know it’s tough seeing a Spanish person not needing your assistance right?
So why do we see so many Hspanics accepting that help in Califoria and other border stated genius?
And I still think your Mr P and not a Latino at all. You study Greek History.
.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:16 pmAlmighty Latin Kings Nation, Do you preen in the mirror with your arms crossed and fingers splayed, with a snarl on your face, and peach fuzz on your chin?
August 28th, 2007 at 3:16 pmBut you won’t know this, right? :)
Comment by why
As if intelligence cares about political ideology.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:17 pmWhy, do you stand behind this president?
Do you believe he is a man of his word?
Comment by hellinabucket — August 28, 2007 @ 3:14 pm
I stand behind this President alot more than I would stand behind any current Democratic politician.
Is Bush perfect, without fault, has his Presidency been flawless? of course not.
but Bush is better than anything that the Dumbcrat party could mustard.
Current Democratic politicians are an embarrassment to humanity.
If Bush is bad, ALL Democratic politicians are infinitly worst.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:17 pmAnyone with an IQ over 100 knows I got more than any Liberal.
So far, the only thing you’ve demonstrated is that you can’t read, over and over again.
Ignorance isn’t an argument.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:17 pm.
they are ignorant, racist and hostile to differing opinion.
#
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nation — August 28, 2007 @ 3:13 pm
#
that does sound familiar…
August 28th, 2007 at 3:18 pmNeither Why, nor the self styled latin king, have a half a brain between them. I guess I could attempt to answer the “questions” but what would be the point. They have already made up their minds, ala Limbaugh I am sure and there is no reason to continue to engage them.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:18 pmwhy,
Let’s not forget Latins that din’t tow the DemoKKKrat’s line are allowed to be attacked racially.
Since we’re not their serfs we are fair game.
The Left is the real racists of taoday.
A combination of the KKK and Stalin they are ignorant, racist and hostile to differing opinion.
They hate self thinking Latins but support Islamo-Fascists!
Strange logic!
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nation — August 28, 2007 @ 3:13 pm
yeap, liberals hate any minority that is not a liberal. The Demokkkratic party is full of racist pigs that only use us to ge them in power.
The sad part is that there are many minorities that allow themselves to be raped by the Demokkkratic party.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:18 pm“Mustard”?
“Worst”?
The ignorant troll has awakened my German heritage. Time to feed.
Have fun watching your loser president crash and burn, halfwit. He is what you deserve.
The rest of us … not so much.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:19 pm.
Ignorance isn’t an argument.
.
Comment by Grand Moff Texan — August 28, 2007 @ 3:17 pm
You are right, so why are you using it?
because your posts are full of ignorance and you think you are all big using this ignorance.
take your own advice kid.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:19 pmbut Bush is better than anything that the Dumbcrat party could mustard.
Comment by why — August 28, 2007 @ 3:17 pm
better than a hot dog? surely you jest.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:20 pmOkay, over an hour ago, I offered why, aka Joker, aka Almighty Knights of Latin Man Love the opportunity to prove himself here. All he had to do was come up with one. single. example. of. my racism.
As of yet, he hasn’t (and he won’t, because none exist)
I’ve played whack a troll long enough (albeit to derail the thread).
August 28th, 2007 at 3:20 pmBack on topic:
Would anyone here want their children to be in a restroom where sexual activities took place? Not homosexual activities. All sexual activities…
Because that is what the good Senator from Idaho was doing. Initiating a sexual activity.
What a bad man, a naughty man.
“Anyone with an IQ over 100 knows I got more than any Liberal.
But you won’t know this, right? :)
Comment by why”
Got more what? more brain damage? more denial? more dates in the men’s room? more neocon spunk up your butt? Help us out here.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:20 pmMoorish loser!
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nations #287
…If (as I suspect) you’re a poor/middle working class Latin-American taxpayer…
…read Comment by bobwurst #288…
…pay particular attention to the “bailout” part…
..then get back to me on who the “losers” are…
August 28th, 2007 at 3:20 pmThey hate self thinking Latins but support Islamo-Fascists!
Strange logic! Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nation
The biggest supporter of Islam has been OIL!!
The biggest supporter of Mexico is AMERICA. You know NAFTA and CAFTA that was supported by Clinton?
August 28th, 2007 at 3:20 pmbecause your posts are full of ignorance and you think you are all big using this ignorance.
Comment by why — August 28, 2007 @ 3:19 pm
Winner! Game over.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:21 pm“And I still think your Mr P and not a Latino at all. You study Greek History.”
Ha I’m not Mr P.
As for Hisapnics in border states, yes you guys have successfully brainwashed them by not teaching them their history and making them dependent on you!
You failed in FL but suceeded in the other 49 states.
Congrats, just like your ancestors did to Blacks and Italians!
as for Greeks they’re our Mediterrenean cousins.
Ultimately Latin civilization is derived fro the Greeks and our cultures are very similiar!
bobwurst
August 28th, 2007 at 3:21 pmWent through that phase oh 16 years ago!
I guess you used to get beaten up by Kings!
Luckily this is the internet and I don’t have the means to discipline you for Violationg our respect!
Conside your self lucky KraKKKER!
“Mustard�
“Worst�
The ignorant troll has awakened my German heritage. Time to feed.
Have fun watching your loser president crash and burn, halfwit. He is what you deserve.
The rest of us … not so much.
.
Comment by Grand Moff Texan — August 28, 2007 @ 3:19 pm
well, once again, I guess I must apologize for English being my second language and Spanish my first.
Oops, sorry all “tolerant” and “inclusive” Liberal.
Not to mention that youa re too stupid to notice that this is NOT a thesis paper or any type of professional document that we are writing on.
I know, I know, fools like you are easily fooled into believing that where LIberals write, it is a professional, well educated place.
in the mean time, go ahead amuse yourself with my gramman and spelling, you Liberals are quite easily amused.
You know you have nothing against me expect to try to make fun of English being my second language.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:22 pmthey are ignorant, racist and hostile to differing opinion -ALKN
Your hate opinion is based on a History before America was even founded.
Get over it!
August 28th, 2007 at 3:22 pmGot more what? more brain damage? more denial? more dates in the men’s room? more neocon spunk up your butt? Help us out here.
Comment by bobwurst — August 28, 2007 @ 3:20 pm
careful with the more dates in the men’s room joke……Liberal homosexual groups are going to go after you and label you a homophobe. :)
August 28th, 2007 at 3:23 pmThe biggest supporter of Mexico is AMERICA.
Ah yes all Latins are from Mexico!
Mexican are the real Latiuns!
Thanks for exposing your ignorance racist scum!
“You know NAFTA and CAFTA”
August 28th, 2007 at 3:23 pmYes destroy Latin America’s Indusrties and eliminate their Middle Class!
and should Craig resign? I mean, all he was doing, and pleaded guilty to, was initiating a sexual activity in a public place, where children might be present.
I mean come on. What’s the problem? It’s not like Joker here has ever had a little come on in the men’s restroom. Should we ban Joker from posting here?
August 28th, 2007 at 3:25 pmAs for Hisapnics in border states, yes you guys have successfully brainwashed them by not teaching them their history and making them dependent on you!
Brainwashed them? Really. I guess you can prove that thru your Latin Roman history? Somehow?
August 28th, 2007 at 3:25 pmI stand behind this President alot more than I would stand behind any current Democratic politician.
If Bush is bad, ALL Democratic politicians are infinitly worst.
Comment by why #314
…Ignorance, and evil are a deadly combination…
…the right wing cultist “why” and it’s Bushite inbrethren…
…are the epitome of ignorance and evil…
…they hate Liberal Progressives/ism…
…more than they love…
…their country, families and what’s right and decent…
…they are moral Kamikazees…
August 28th, 2007 at 3:28 pm“You know NAFTA and CAFTAâ€
Yes destroy Latin America’s Indusrties and eliminate their Middle Classs -AKLN
BWAHAHA, you fell for it Bush backed them as well, Fool!!! And now you deny that Hispanics are not of Latin decent?
And Americans are Racist for giving Latinos aid to help feed and clothe their children?
August 28th, 2007 at 3:29 pmlatin king, I never had any run ins with the kings, I’m a nice suburban whiteboy, but rest assured, you don’t scare me now and you wouldn’t have back then. The fact that you make threats that you and everyone else here knows you can’t make good on just proves what a child you are.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:30 pmgo back to the mirror, pull your moms blue bandana back on your head and pose. pendaho.
#
and should Craig resign? I mean, all he was doing, and pleaded guilty to, was initiating a sexual activity in a public place, where children might be present.
I mean come on. What’s the problem? It’s not like Joker here has ever had a little come on in the men’s restroom. Should we ban Joker from posting here?
Comment by DRxJ — August 28, 2007 @ 3:25 pm
I go through that airport w/ my son at least 6 times a year. My son
would use the restrooms with me waiting outside.
no more.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:31 pmThanks why for answering my questions. I do have more.
Was Bush justified in attacking Iraq? If yes, then what do you believe the justifications to be?
August 28th, 2007 at 3:32 pmSo, Mr P ALKN, Why did Spain say this?
MADRID, Spain (CNN) — Spain’s prime minister-elect has described the country’s participation in the war in Iraq as “a total error”
You are not a Latin King Mr P, give it up, we know your games too well.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:33 pmYou know you have nothing against me expect to try to make fun of English being my second language.
Comment by why #328
…I would pile on criticizing your grammar too…
…”expect” sic…
…you don’t make sense in ANY language…
August 28th, 2007 at 3:36 pmWhy You So Crazy,
I don’t like Bush or Clinton.
“And Americans are Racist for giving Latinos aid to help feed and clothe their children?”
Yes,
Leftists like you do that so we becasom dependent and vote for you.
It worked in the 49 Staes except Florida where we built our own businesses and politivcal power structure.
I never said Hispanics aren’t Latin dorkface.
I was just pointing our your racist thinking that We’re all poor little Mexican!
You are racist Leftard and your post has proved it.
Thanks!
I’m not Mr P.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:38 pm“Spain’s prime minister-elect has described the country’s participation in the war in Iraq as “a total errorâ€
It was!
Heck the Iraq war is a mistake.
I’m against it as it was fought for no reason!
bobwurst
August 28th, 2007 at 3:39 pm“I’m a nice suburban whiteboy, b”
Figures, so play your position!
why should he resign? if he were smart he would just say “i’m here and i’m queer” and let the gop suck on that!
August 28th, 2007 at 3:50 pmbobwurst
“I’m a nice suburban whiteboy, bâ€
Figures, so play your position!
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nation
I’m comfortable with who I am and I don’t need to front, poser.
August 28th, 2007 at 3:58 pmComment by Laura Killed her Boyfriend
…like your moniker…
August 28th, 2007 at 4:00 pmYou Almighty Latin Kings Nation (aka Joker) and Daryll are disgusting subhumans.
August 28th, 2007 at 4:03 pmJoker I have read your posts and YOU are a racist, that is why you were banned.
Daryll you are just a plain old supersitious idiot, probably a closet gay.
Pretty sure that they will be banning Almighty Latin Kings Nation (aka Joker) again pretty soon, his blatant racism shows in almost everything he (tries) to post.
Well, anyway you both suck at the human thing, try to lower your bar a bit, try maybe neanderthal, that would be easier for you both.
I just love all the “demokkkrat, libtards, leftist” labeling. Instead of ever presenting a fact based response to anything posted, they resort to the only card they have….nah nah nah nah nah….name calling. I for one think Craig should not resign, even though I am a liberal. He should just come out and state for the record he’s gay and let the chips fall where they may. People in Louisiana, Texas, Ohio, Alabama, Florida and Georgia do not seem to mind that their elected officials are either adultresses, closet gays, pedophiles and thieves so why should another GOP state like Idaho be any different….I think the motto of the GOP should be “we hate all peds and gays and criminals unless they are our own.”
August 28th, 2007 at 4:13 pmhe would just say “i’m here and i’m queer†and let the gop suck on that!
Comment by Thor #343
…the line of takers…
…would be too long…
August 28th, 2007 at 4:17 pmAt least the “conservative” scumbags are beginning to stand up and demand the elected officials they support display some small measure of competency: The have to be able to conceal their criminal activities from public scrutiny.
That’s a change from the bush administration where the criteria was to have enough money to buy silence from the legal system when they get caught.
August 28th, 2007 at 4:19 pmYou folks sure spend a lot of time worrying about other people’s personal behavior…..at least you do when it suits your purposes…
Comment by O. Bigfoot — August 28, 2007 @ 1:07 pm
HAWHAWHAWHAWHAW!
August 28th, 2007 at 5:09 pmYou folks sure spend a lot of time worrying about other people’s personal behavior…..at least you do when it suits your purposes…
Comment by O. Bigfoot — August 28, 2007 @ 1:07 pm
Exactly. Who really cares if Clinton inhaled or was unfaithful.
August 28th, 2007 at 5:21 pm“You folks sure spend a lot of time worrying about other people’s personal behavior…..at least you do when it suits your purposes…
Comment by O. Bigfoot ”
A classic case of a big shoe being on the other bigfoot.
August 28th, 2007 at 5:26 pm“I suppose that he pleaded guilty to avoid a trial and further “exposure.†Uh Hum, cough cough. But give me a break disorderly conduct or interference with privacy. seems kind of weak when all he did was waive his hand under the stall and maybe play a little footsy. Creepy? yes. Obvious Intention to do “somethingâ€? probably. But it seems like a thought crime.”
-You’re right.
August 28th, 2007 at 5:52 pmWhen Craig saw the hand with the cop badge he “thought” he was busted…and he was!
what craig’s doing in the john is saving a lobbyist money. or rather, since he gets it free, craig can say he can’t be bought. he is, as the recipient, on the take.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:27 pmIn todays statement, the good Senator stated repeatedly
“I am not gay, I am not Gay”!!!!!!!
Next question, “are you Bisexual Senator”??????
Any one notice he never went near that one????
We will see how long it takes the Einsteins in the Press to get the picture.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:28 pmas for Greeks they’re our Mediterrenean cousins.
Ultimately Latin civilization is derived fro the Greeks and our cultures are very similiar!
…
Comment by Almighty Latin Kings Nation — August 28, 2007 @ 3:21 pm
—
100% True!
August 28th, 2007 at 7:54 pmSpeaking of creepy, they just don’t come any creepier than ol’ Ari. I never saw anybody more arrogant for less reason.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:29 pmLiving in Idaho I have to say i’m very disappointed in Larry Craig, and think he
August 28th, 2007 at 8:57 pmshould resign now. I also say to any democrat that backed Clinton, to not be a
hipocrite and bash Craig, if you didn’t ask
for Clinton to resign.
I say Idahoan conservatives should convince patriot Robert Vasquez to re-enter the campaign (after dropping out in April). The Idaho GOP should put out an olive branch to Vasquez and get on board together. If anyone here has heard him speak, he is an excllent speaker who knows his stuff, is a war vet and is right on the Invasion issue which is big even in Idaho.
August 28th, 2007 at 10:21 pm“Y’all need t’ stop blamin’ Larry fuh all dis bathroom foolishness…
…after all…
…I da ho”…
-G Duhya-
August 28th, 2007 at 11:15 pmPlease, this gay GOP thing has been going on for years.
August 29th, 2007 at 1:09 amhttp://www.thelawparty.org/FranklinCoverup/franklin.htm
Its time to speak the unspeakable “T” word Guys and Gals.
Term limits! Well, make that 2 words if you like.
Permanent Power is Absolute Power, and we know what Absolute
Power produces. Just watch any cable news feed. The common
American gets urine tested, but the people at the top are above
such intrusion? The more fool us. Lets wait and see which Saint
recommends this from a mega church pulpit. Lets urine test the
Ministers as well.
That is an issue that we should all, on both
August 29th, 2007 at 1:45 amsides of the equation, unite and make this a
reality. Unless you would rather depend on
the Politicians to do it. Good luck with that.
I would have thought Progs would have applauded the Senator making an anonymous pass at someone in a men’s room……..
August 29th, 2007 at 10:50 amNow I understand:
Sack them for sex.
Reward them for war.
Got it!
It all makes sense now!
August 29th, 2007 at 7:22 pm